|
JOHN FORBES KERRY
Ladies and Gentlemen, I accept your nomination for President of the United States. (John Forbes Kerry July 29, 2004 10:22pm Boston, MA. Beginning with the Clinton speech on Monday night and ending with the Kerry acceptance speech tonight it has been a stellar convention, full of rising new stars (Barak Obama) stars breaking in on the scene (John Edwards) old stars reminding us of how bright things have been before and can be again (Ted Kennedy.) No one can deny this has been a clarion call to man the voting booths and stand in the place that the "greatest generation" is leaving...rebuilding America. Kerry accepted his party nomination with the Ascendent in Aries at 4 degrees, the Mid-Heaven (the leader) is at 2 degrees Capricorn, its ruler Saturn falls to the bottom of the chart, in opposition to the Moon and Chiron. Usually that would spell bad news for a candidate except the Moon and Chiron in the 10th form the "reaction point" to the yod (finger of God) Most importantly tonights Sun at 7 degrees Leo is in an applying conjuction to John Kerry's North Node and just past a conjunction to the US North Node. That spells a new leader for the Democrats, and a new leader for the nation as well. At the end of the day on election night (7:00pm Washington, DC) the Asc/Des are exactly polar opposites of his Natal Chart, putting his Moon in the 1st house of the Election Chart and Sun in the 7th House of others, and his Progressed Sun will be moving toward the Mid-heaven at 7:00pm November 2nd and John Edwards Sun in the 1st House. I think we have a couple of winners here folks. And if GWB has one more scandal, one more problem, one more obfuscation that turns out badly for him, he is gone. Mars at 22 degrees Leo sextiles Kerry's Saturn, T Venus conjuncts Kerry's Saturn and sextiles T Mars setting up a yod with Chiron and tonight's Moon is moving toward that point of destiny. Everything is not a foregone conclusion; on election night T Moon will conjunct tonights Saturn and oppose the acceptance speech Moon. With Neptune in the 11 house at 14 Aquarius there is a danger of Kerry receiving misguided advice and that problem is reinforced by Kerry's natal Neptune falling in the 7th house of others in the Boston Chart. Those aspects suggest landmines he will have to weave around and watch the Gemini tendency to flip-flop because it will be used against him. With Venus in the 3rd House of this chart, sextile Mars, the Press just might give him a break during the election season. The acceptance speech and chart aside, on election day there are no disappointing aspects for Kerry/Edwards in their Natal Charts. Take heart from that.
Sally Cheyne McDonald on Jul 30 | Link
Comments
Bless You Sally for posting this so darn quick! I thought I'd have to wait until tomorrow to read your (or anyone else's) views on the Chart. I enjoyed what you wrote. And I believe, looking at Kerry's 1996, I think, race against Gov. Weld which he won despite being dangerously low in the polls, that Kerry and Edwards will be able to successfuly skirt those landmines and perhaps plant a few of their own for the Bushes. Kerry's got a political lifetime of fighting dirty tricks and he's ready for whatever Bush/Cheney/Rove can throw at him. And I believe, taking into account Bush's delusional grandiosity and Cheney's arrogance, that they may have underestimated Kerry and Edwards. Never screw with a Prosecutor. They know where the jugular is and are not afraid to go for it. Again, wonderful article and I look forward to the many comments I'm certain will follow. Jonathan (okay, I think I'm finally done for the night) LOL Posted by: Jonathan on July 30, 2004 04:46 AMAfter watching Kerry's speech,I am truly optimistic and energized. I am just wondering, however, after watching CNN's coverage,just how badly Time Warner wants Bush to win. I mean after months of complaing about Kerry's lack of passion, overemphasis on boring details, tendency to be overly pedantic, etc. media whores Judy Woodruff and Jeff Greenfield could not stop whining about Kerry's lack of specifics, his emphasis on self definition and creating and expressing a bold optimistic vision, rather than giving a laundry list of senate achievements and vote justifications. You just cannot win with these people (unless you are W) but guess what, the American people WILL WIN when Bush gets his sorry ass thrown back to Crawford in the Fall! This was one of the truly great political speeches of all time. Posted by: grizzly on July 30, 2004 04:58 AMAnyone want to run a chart on Time Warner? I'd use the one from a few years ago when America Online took over the company. I'm guessing there will be rough waters ahead for Bugs Bunny and friends. Posted by: Robert Arctor on July 30, 2004 05:13 AMIt was one KICK ASS speach!!! I just hope that people stayed tuned to hear the pundits tear it apart while their memories were still fresh from the excellence. The media discredits itself too boldly. Two of my favorite lines were: :"Wouldn't it be nice to have a President who believes in science?" "Let us humbly pray that we are on G+d's side."
Sally, I have been lurking here for a long time, and believe me, everytime I would post a long message, I would get a phone call and then my computer would freeze up and I would lose everything and get discouraged, oh my..... So I don't post much. But I want to say how much I enjoy your astrological essays! John Kerry is 6 months younger than I am....I was born in June of 1943 (in Honolulu, and isn't Obama great?)....Vietnam was the defining issue (besides civil rights) for our generation. Now it has come home with Kerry.... Grizzly...I watch the CSPAN coverage...no talking heads at the corporate media outlets - I try to keep my blood pressure in check, hahahah. But I turned to the least offensive of the coverage, PBS just in time, at the end of the speech, to hear Repub star David Brooks saying that the Republicans had to go change their clothes because they were sweating SO badly over the last hour.....this was a homerun speech. I am also reading Clinton's MY LIFE....and here is what he has said about being a "winner" Democrat ... --------------------------------------------- Sally you are most excellent! Thank you so much! Posted by: Pat C on July 30, 2004 05:26 AMJudi, what a wonderful passage to share. I hope you spread that far and wide, reminding everyone who we are dealing with. Posted by: Pat C on July 30, 2004 05:32 AMsally said "And if GWB has one more scandal, one more problem, one more obfuscation that turns out badly for him, he is gone." well, sally, this is truly inspirational. here is a menu of scancals, problems, and obfuscations over the next three months: (1) we see the child abuse videos from iraq; Sally, you said just 'one more'. Take your pick! Great article. Quite amazing by any standards and all the more so considering the deadline. Sally, you wrote: An astrological question, Sally, how do you see "yods" operating? Will this be a frustration aspect for Kerry - and why shouldn't it be, as politics could be called the finger of G*d....all frustration, and then you are fingered - politics is winning OR losing, isn't it? And always after great effort....no wonder it takes people to be "born" to it... oh...I asked about that particular yod because my daughter has the same planets...MC/Saturn in Taurus sextile Venus in Cancer and inconjuncting Mars in Aries....all in 8 degrees of the signs. Oh...and because I am an artist, I often get visuals...and when I heard the "Help is on the way" thing, I suddendly saw Kerry and all the supporters marching with their "help is on the way" signs....and right next to him, Bush with "hell is on the way " signs.... oh dear, is that too harsh? Posted by: judi on July 30, 2004 05:39 AMI was too young for JFK, but looking at John and John this evening, so youthful and dynamic (how could Bush & Cheney even compare) with their intelligent and lovely families - I could almost imagine how Americans must have hoped and dreamed back then - and could again. Posted by: on July 30, 2004 05:40 AMThanks Sally for sharing your wonderful insight- We had a great rousing Kerry-Acceptance Speech House Party and then to read your newest article. . .I'm floating on air "That spells a new leader for the Democrats, and a new leader for the nation as well". "The acceptance speech and chart aside, on election day there are no disappointing aspects for Kerry/Edwards in their Natal Charts. Take heart from that". Posted by: KAP on July 30, 2004 05:42 AMPat, I hope people copy that passage and spread it far and wide. I have a really dear friend whom I went to Art Center in LA with -we have known each other since we were 18....she is tres intelligent and a wonderful writer now....and she said Clinton's escapades with Monica made her skin crawl, and that he is responsible for helping Gore lose, and that is why we are in Iraq and all those people have died. (OK...I sure as hell don't agree with ANY of that) Which sounds as if she has bought all the lies promulgated by the rightwing media. So I sent her that passage this morning. I then followed it up this evening with this second one: (this was after the "did he inhale?" question and after Don Imus called him a "rednecked bozo" on air, just two of the problems he started having to face. Jefferson even wrote about the obligation of a President's associates to protect his reputation at all costs: "When the accident of situation is to give us a place in history, for which nature had not prepared us by corresponding endowments, it is the duty of those about us carefully to veil from the public eye the weaknesses, and still more, the vices of our character." The veil had been ripped from my weaknesses and vices, both real and imagined. The public knew more about them than about my record, message, or whaterver virtues I might have. If my reputation was in tatters, I might not be able to be elected no matter how much people agreed with what I wanted to do, or how well they thought I might do it. In the face of all the character attacks, I responded as I always did when my back was against the wall - I plowed on......... Posted by: judi on July 30, 2004 05:47 AMWay past bedtime. Do a secondary progreasion of tonigh's acceptance chart to Nov 2, about 10 or 11 PM, EST, around that place a transit chart for Nov 2 at about 10 or 11 PM. bob Posted by: bob on July 30, 2004 06:07 AMHappy Blue moon for Saturday everyone! I believe humanity is awakening. So many great speeches and upliftment for human hearts to strive forward. Why limit our choices as only between good and ego (evil) when we can make them between good and better. So yogic. Thanks Sally for such a quick article, you are always so generous. I am surrounding Kerry and Edwards with light for protection in my inner eye. The frightened fear mongering cabal might get really ugly. I watched Lee Harvey Oswald shot before my very eyes live on TV when I was 8 yrs old. I had precognitive thoughts of the assasination occuring a few seconds before it actually did. It made me doubt my 'knowing' for a long time. Posted by: bhakti on July 30, 2004 06:18 AMJudy: A yod is complicated and indicates the finger of destiny. They can work positively or negatively. I am counting on this one working positively for Kerry because the Venus leg was on his Saturn and the Acceptance Chart had the Mid-heaven in Capricorn. The Saturn at 19 degrees Cancer is at the reaction point and puts tonight's Moon and Saturn in a mutual reception. These charts are rich with information and I didn't nearly cover it all, I was too anxious to get something up for everyone. But there are Mercury/Neptune aspects, his Natal Venus (ruler of his Mid-heaven and the US Mid-heaven sextiles tonight's mid-heaven, Uranus aspects his Venus, and Jupiter (ruler of his sun sign) is in an applying aspect (sextile) to tonight's Saturn. If Kerry ends up making it to the election he has a great chance, and if he doesn't John Edwards will carry it I think. Remember I am holding out judgement as to whether Bush or Kerry will run until Oct. 10. If they are both left standing after Oct. 10, then I am counting on a Kerry win. Posted by: sally on July 30, 2004 06:31 AMbhakti, thanks for the comment on the oswald murder. i was about 12. it also took away my sense of 'knowing' and trust for a long time and i just figured out why (thanks to you). we were supposed to know he was about to die; it was a staged event; oswald was lead, fully exposed, to slaughter; and it made perfect visual sense, designed to fit the story line of concluding the slaughter of kennedy. at the last moment, it appears oswald realized this in a moment of rapid lucidity. we are headed for the last opportunity to correct this obscenity. i'm sure we wlil. Posted by: mike on July 30, 2004 06:36 AMMike what a great list and all so possible. I mean they are not out of the relm of possibility. I love it. Do you have a pick? I have one more I would like to add to the list and that is the "TRUE" story of 9/11 comes out. Keep the list Mike as the next few months unravel you might find you are prophetic. Posted by: Sally on July 30, 2004 06:36 AMI had a conversation with my candidate this evening after the speech ended. There is something truly sychronistic going on in this country. John Kerry's speech, indeed all the convention speeches, touched on issues that may as well be happening down the street. It's eerie how things that were touched on in the speeches, we've been adding those ideas to our campaign message all throughout the last week. Take the THK speech about women being called opinionated. My candidate added that concept to her stump speech at my request the day before THK spoke. Or take Kerry's comments about family values and valuing families. We started a word-of-mouth campaign on that issue last week. It's bizzarre how much overlap there is. And it's not from trying to coordinate our message either. My candidate says that sometimes the problems in small systems exist as a microcosm of the same problems in much larger systems. That phenomenon is clearly going on here. The problems Kerry talked about are both local and national. I'm certain that candidates and their campaign managers are having this conversation all around the country. So did I think it was a good speech? Ummm yes. Posted by: Dave on July 30, 2004 06:53 AMSally.....since I am not a professional and practicing astrologer, but only one who saw "patterns" and tried to explain it with a language that made some sense to me, alot of the complexity that you are able to explain I see as your talent...for complex issues! I await further complexities! Thanks for this.... This is also connected to the aspect of this hopeful and wonderful energy for the future being manifested now....I am always interested in my daughter's chart because, as Dave said above (wonderful insight into something I had noticed, too - Dave, that state of the art Democratic, fully paid for, headquarters has paid off....they are in real communication with every idea I have seen presented over the last 3 years) , there are a lot of synchronicities around gathering energies, as in the the JFK assassination, and the Oswald murder (and the consipiracies which still abound)...and my daughter was born Aug 10, 1969 in Hollywood. 2 weeks early, every woman who was almost full term gave birth that Sunday in LA....(a basalmic moon in Cancer)....my doctor delivered 4 women and 5 babies that day, all of us due in the next 2 weeks....why? Ask why Charles Manson chose that day and the previous day to unleash the evil of the murders of Sharon Tate and the LaBiancos (my daughter was born at the same time the LoBiancos were murdered, dawn on that Sunday, an innocent older couple chosen at random in the Hollywood Hills, and we had connections with half of the people murdered, including Sharon Tate ). And there was, according to my daughter's uncle, who is a lifelong Eckenkar member, "music in the spheres" when she was born...no retrograde planets, (but she has 3 "Yods")....that was a time of gathering energies, but they were so negative, and they ushered in more - the height of the Vietnam war. What has 9/11 ushered in? btw, I had dreams before Indira Ghandi was assassinated....she was only a little younger than JFK. As for the Oswald murder....wow! You who "saw" it before hand at such a young age had an early consciousness opening (I've had that precognitive stuff so badly that I have had to go to bed for days before something actually happens). So Bhakti, I join you and I hope everyone will join and keep that protective energy around all the candidates and Edwards and Kerry. A woman spiritual intuitive I worked with for years assured me when Bush was elected that it "would get worse"....perhaps so that we could see CLEARLY what the results of THAT would be, and lift our own collective consciousness? It has been 29 years (that Saturn cycle) since the inception of the Plan for the New American Century and the neocons vision of THEIR dream for America....and to quote (in reference to a cycle finishing) what I heard someone say, cynically, quoting Malcom X, right after JFK was pronounced dead, " the chickens have come home to roost." Let's not forget that next year will be 42 years since that event . For people of my (Kerry's) generation, those years were the death of our idealism, with the assassinations of our hopeful leaders by those dark forces, and I haven't seen that hopeful energy (except for Clinton, and he was "assassinated" also) until this week with this convention. I cannot bear to conjecture this half cycle of Uranus when it is completed. I can only hope that those dark and malevolent forces will have been defeated. Posted by: judi on July 30, 2004 07:35 AMSynchronicity = paradigm shift. We've shifted, Can't you feel the energy of the awakening? I started feeling hopeful right after the Venus Occulation of June 8. As a reminder Pluto at 19 Sag is on Black Hole Ianna/Ereshkigal = regime change. Send the moving van to 1600.
http://www.drudgereport.com/dnc83.htm Posted by: wv on July 30, 2004 01:28 PMps The law of contradiction is how we learn in the relam of duality. Humans needed to have their free will taken away to appreciate it, to not get complacent. Big Daddy syndrome only causes even bigger babys and bigger dirty diapers. Time to clean oursleves and move on. Posted by: bhakti on July 30, 2004 01:29 PMJudi, I thought your quote from Clinton's book aptly summed up this former Dean supporters take on his presidential run demise: "But I was different. With a strong record in economic development, education, and crime, and a strong DLC message, I actually had a chance to win. So if I ran, they would have to destroy me personally. "Here's how Washington works, " he said. "The press has to have somebody in every election, and we're going to give them you." I must admit that I loved John Kerry's line about him being born in the West Wing of Fitzsimmons in Colorado. Classic! Jonathan Posted by: Jonathan on July 30, 2004 02:14 PM
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/30/opinion/30krugman.html?pagewanted=print&position= Posted by: wv on July 30, 2004 02:40 PMAs an elective chart the time Kerry acepted the nomination is about as good as it gets the.The moon is always the key in an elective chart for success it must be in a good house and the first major aspect it makes should be harmonious and to a benifac. In the nomination aceptance chart the moon is in the house of worldly success and recognition. It is bright, expanding in light and the first aspect it makes is the tine to Jupiter.If iam not mistaken when bush accepts the nomination the first aspect the moon makes ishe opposition to Saturn so right there you have who is favored by providence and who is being shut down and blocked. Dream on. Posted by: Pat C on July 30, 2004 03:31 PMHere is the link to the Esquire article. Ron Reagan is "Krugman good". http://www.esquire.com/features/articles/2004/040729_mfe_reagan_1.html Posted by: Pat C on July 30, 2004 03:40 PMMy heart is so full! After what has seemed like almost four years of an unrelenting triple Saturn transit (that's what it has FELT like, anyway), hope is back and I predict great amounts of champagne and wet Kleenex from tears of stratospheric joy on November 2nd! I think we should all print out that list of Mike's and WILL that the truth of all of Chimp's trangressions come into the searing light before Champagne Day! Posted by: Lucy on July 30, 2004 03:47 PMI was not addressing Chas whith the dream on comment. Enough said I guess. Posted by: Pat C on July 30, 2004 03:50 PMFirst of all Joe, you don't stoop low for stars. The Universe just doesn't work that way. Stars are in the heavens above and as above, so below. Secondly, Liberals are not desparate. No one on this site is desparate. We share and express ideas, most of which are based on astrological symbolism. That is all. I happen to disagree with your take on W. Bush's energies. We will see. I am especially interested in how those energies will play out during the debates, where we can finally see Bush/Kerry play out, one on one. PS, Thank you Sally and Chas for the wonderful analysis. Would the day that W. Bush be accepting his party's nomination be this coming Sept 2? Posted by: Shade on July 30, 2004 04:06 PMSally and Chas, thanks so much. Posted by: Janet on July 30, 2004 04:53 PMI just cannot, for the life of me, understand how anyone can support this man after all the lies, scandals and harm he has brought to this country. Read Ron Reagan's article in Esquire, posted above. It saddens me deeply to think that this country may be subjected to another four years of this atrocious plundering just because a group of people are hell-bent on not losing face. Because they just don't want to see the truth and admit that they misjudged and voted for a man who has turned out to be the worst thing that has ever happened to this country. OPEN YOUR EYES. Posted by: Lucy on July 30, 2004 04:55 PM
http://www.gregpalast.com/printerfriendly.cfm?artid=353 Posted by: wv on July 30, 2004 04:56 PMJo We are anxiously awaiting your take on the Come out of the garden. Your sagacity is eagerly awaited..... Posted by: wv on July 30, 2004 05:01 PM"The biggest load of crock?" You even sound like Bush. Posted by: Lucy on July 30, 2004 05:12 PMDear Joe, I find your fears and concerns about astrology to be interesting and I can understand why someone who doesn't know anything about astrology might fear it. I also understand how much you want "your guy" GWB to win and I do know when our ego is attached to a specific candidate Astrology is like the weather report if there is a storm coming and it's going to be over "me" it doesnt' matter whether I am prepared or want it to come, it's going to come anyway. It might help you if you studied just a little more about mundane (events) astrology. GWB has not given his acceptance speech as yet and the energies of that speech will be evaluated just as Kerry's energies were evaluated, as those energies relate to the election and the US. It isn't the intent of this site to prove or disprove astrology or to teach astrology, for you to be able to get the most out of the site or to even to be able address the issues you need some type of understanding of the subject, so I can easily see why you are frustrated. Posted by: Sally on July 30, 2004 05:24 PMOh as a post-script Joe, perhaps you don't mean it to be so, but your posts sound a great deal like "baiting" others into an argument and I am sorry but "baiting" isn't allowed on this site because it becomes just too ugly. So if the angry If you have a different astrological perspective please feel free to post. Posted by: on July 30, 2004 05:29 PMJoe, astrology was not wrong in 2000. Al Gore did win. Posted by: Pat C on July 30, 2004 05:29 PMJoe, you're an obvious baiter. No matter what anyone says to you you will argue it just to bait. You are no longer credible and I will not reply to you. I hope you move on into a better place of learning where you can grow rather than stunt yourself. Posted by: Pat C on July 30, 2004 05:34 PMJoe: First and foremost, Bush's transiting Saturn is in his 12th house and approaching his ASC. - 1st house. During this process SATURN will be RESTRUCTURING BUSH'S inner life, hopefully putting him in touch with who he really is. It will be almost impossible for Bush to have any kind of OUTER success or accomplishment due to the symoblogy of this process. His focus in life will be centered on his innermost self. Even if Bush were to be re-elected, he will not achieve any outer success and will feel completely burdened by the office of the Presidency. Astrology, planets, do not cause events -- they corrolate to events. Regardless of what other positive astrologly transits Bush may be currently under, his Saturn going under the horizon for the next 14 years is to me the primary issue concerning his near term success, achievement, or accomplishment in political realms. There will be NONE. He can heed the call to restructure his inner workings, which are sorely needed, and Saturn is teaching, but it is up to him. Posted by: Beverly on July 30, 2004 06:17 PMFreeper Joe, Kerry's acceptance of the nomination at 10:22pm, gives an Asc degree between 4-5 Aries, a 5 degree sabian symbol. Rudhyar's interpretation of that degree is: ARIES 5 A Triangle with wings Works for me. Joe: I am not using any coordinates. My feeling, and belief in this matter is based on where transiting Saturn is right now. Approaching a return to the Natal Saturn in the 12th house in Cancer. Further, Joe, I feel no need or reason to verify, nothing is correct or incorrect. Saturn is where it is at, which is not debateable. We are as human beings, connected to the Whole of the Universe and therefore, subject to the ebb and flow of universal cycles inherent in the Universe. Astrology speaks to the Universal archetypes as depicted by the chararistics displayed by the planets. I also agree that individuals can rise above the potentials inherent in the birthchart, however, to me this requires a tremendous, continueous amount of work on oneself. I do not believe, based on my study of Mr. Bush, that he has evolved his consciousness, has become And from William Saletan at Slate ***The theory behind Bush's hard-line style of governance came from his chief political adviser, Karl Rove. Rove believed that Bush lost the popular vote in 2000 because millions of conservatives stayed home. He believed that Bush's father lost the 1992 election by alienating the right and creating a Republican primary challenge by Pat Buchanan. So, on issue after issue, the current President Bush has played to his base. On Rove's theory, every step to the right earns Bush another conservative vote. That calculation is correct. But it's only half the story. For every conservative voter who's inspired to turn out for Bush because of his unyielding conservatism, there's a liberal voter who's inspired to turn out for Kerry. That's why Kerry has had no trouble uniting his party after the primaries. It's why the FleetCenter exploded tonight at every one of Kerry's applause lines. And it's why Kerry can now move aggressively to the middle without fear of losing the left. In his determination to unite the right, Bush hasn't just united the left. He has lost the center. Look at last week's New York Times/CBS News poll of registered voters. "Do you think the result of the war with Iraq was worth the loss of American life and other costs of attacking Iraq or not?" Fifty-nine percent say it was not. "Which do you think is a better way to improve the national economy—cutting taxes or reducing the federal budget deficit?" Fifty-eight percent say reducing the deficit. "When it comes to regulating the environmental and safety practices of business, do you think the federal government is doing enough, should it do more, or should it do less?" Fifty-nine percent say more. One more Bush voter on the right, balanced by one more Kerry voter on the left, plus the tilting of one more voter in the middle toward Kerry, is a net loss for the president. That's the lesson of this administration, this election, and this convention. Kerry doesn't have to write any good lines. He just has to read them.*** ...worth a read, and consideration.... http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article6557.htm Posted by: wv on July 30, 2004 07:39 PMTill now, wondering that a repug/con like joe hasn't shown up here to denfend other cons like Joe, BTW. I'm an Author. I am all over the world. And I will be sticking my nose out way long. Can't stop me. Posted by: bhakti on July 30, 2004 08:06 PMFor your info, joe, cons are conservatives and repugs is self explantory as repugnants who are republicans, as usual a tyro repug-con would not know with neagtive IQs like the shrub, quayle etc. Yes, I think bhatki is correct and we should just ignore ol' hard-on Joe. He'll move along and try to get satisfaction elsewhere. Posted by: Miz Tery on July 30, 2004 08:11 PMWV, When you ask the universe for something, you must be specific! Ask for "Jo" and specify the form! or, you get a freeper. ANYONE who defends a political position by referring to his candidate as a 'great man' is simply not debating... but emotionally reacting. The political issues are debated on a multitude of websites. It is narrow minded of someone to negate the discussion of others because it is not done in the manner they choose... WV, the 'garden' I am involved in at present is 'kindergarten' --- this is the last week of summer for the grandchildren, and we just got my Dad moved from Charleston to here... so, to say the month of July was busy would be an understatement. I watched and listened to Kerry last night... I thought he was strong, he touched on many points some in the Democratic party have wanted addressed, he stood tall, smiled warmly, used his hands in an ever 'open' manner --- embracing many times... his words were about UNITY, not separation... this country is in desperate need of healing... he is the man for that job. The entire week went well, although uncovered by networks... so many 'swing voters' probably didn't see it... not everyone has cable... in fact, many people cannot afford full cable if they have it all... not everyone has computers either... but the blogs have been highly instrumental in getting the POV of the progressives and the democrats out to the Demo candidate... Kerry seemed to address questions posed by the blogs and embrace the positions held by many of the posters. In reviewing comments on KOS late last night, there were high marks every where for Kerry... and the pundits, whores that they are, had to at least give him good marks... A candidate's speech won't win the election, but it will either motivate his party or leave them limp with disappointment. Kerry seized the party for his own last night (imho)... that is important, with the overriding hope being that he did have some swing voters watching... if they watched, they had to be attracted... what's not to like when the issues most of us are dealing with daily are addressed head-on: backdoor draft of Reserve and Nat'l Guard, 'lack of support' for our troops with decrease in budget for their VA benefits as well as medical care when they return wounded; an unnecessary war! [sorry, Joe, this pResident did not respond adequately after the fact or before, imho... Afghanistan nor Iraq had anything to do with 9/11! His response was 'sabre rattling' and jingoism --- typical of a weak leader with no real exit strategy or goal!] I could go on and on, Medicare, education, etc., the outsourcing of jobs... heck John Q. Public knows how hard his pocketbook has been hit every time he stops for gas or takes his child to the doctor, forget the dentist... who's getting braces these days! You're right Beverly, Saturn is visiting Dubya and finding him unprepared, his structure and form lacking for the 'house' he has built... 'nough said... BLUE, Joanna, I see oceans of BLUE, everywhere, edged with purple, interspersed, with purple, unity and BLUE... because that's what I choose to see! I WILL not draw a victory for the other side to me. Period. John Kerry said last night that it is now up to us, the people. Well, some of us will be behind him, and some of us will be in front showing him the way, and some --- like bhakti, with her Pallas Athena in full gear --- will be SHOVING the freepers out of the way. Some will even be soaring overhead painting their visions for Kerry and all to see... We WILL prevail... because we have to... we cannot allow the destruction of this great country to continue... the terrorists created the events of 9/11... the Bush Admin has created the subsequent mess in the demise of our freedoms and liberties and the huge deficit that our grandchildren will inherit. Response to the terrorists? Bush gets a "F" from me. As a leader, Bush gets a "F" from me. Time for regime change at home and Kerry proved last night that we can go to the polls in favor of our candidate, not simply against theirs. The universe has delivered. Kerry has delivered. The people will deliver on November 2nd. The moving vans will deliver Dubya to Crawford. Go BLUE... Namaste Posted by: Jo on July 30, 2004 08:13 PMFlip : Leave no child behind Flip:I'm the War President Flip: It's Patriotic to defend our troops Flip: Kenny Boy Joe, go freep elsewhere. This site doesn't need your kind of 'fair and balanced' viewpoint. Posted by: on July 30, 2004 08:20 PMBut it was very leagal for shrub to send other peoples' kids to die for an illegal war and commit Joe, I don't know where you are an educator but I recently was hired to do a study of Jr. High, High School and Community College around the US regarding their needs and how best the National umbrella association who hired me, could assist them. I did not hear one educator in one city or one state or one level of education say anything positive about the "no child left behind." And that wasn't even one of my questions, indeed not even one of the concerns of the organization requesting the study. Nonetheless I received an earful about the cuts, the lack of assistance from the National Level, the "promises" vs the "reality" Budgets being cut, teachers laid off, increased class sizes with reduced resources and the list goes on. This isn't a left or right issue Joe, what is happening in the country is an American issue. Of course there will be tons of people vote for GWB, that doesn't make him a good president on foreign policy, or the environment, health care, education, or homeland security. How many "experts" do we need in all these areas to tell us we are on the wrong track before people listen. George Bush is not an expert in any of these areas by his own admission. People who have worked decades in their fields including many conservatives are shocked and concerned over this administration. Do you believe they don't know what they are talking about and this inexperienced administration does? How good can a President be if he won't listen to the advice of experts and keeps his focus narrow. How can he bill himself a "war president" one week and a "peace president" the next. This country has been going through massive changes and will continue to do so because the world is changing rapidly, how can I possibly vote for someone who takes a stand and is so inflexible that he cannot make adjustments when new information or situations come along. That is insanity. Pat Buchanan (an arch conservative) said no matter who wins this election there is a divisive fight coming for the Republicans and he didn't know if they could hold it together for the election, they are very upset over the Bush administrations policies and attitudes toward this country, this constitution, this congress (and his party controls congress)They are angry over the wonton spending and budget deficits. It has to change, this country has fallen into dire economic straits since he took office. We have basically thrown those children and their children you say you teach to a mortgaged future. You seem hurt that the "left" is critical of "this poor man in the White House." You don't seem bothered by the dirty tricks "this poor man" plays on others or his unconcern about the future of this nation, including you. It isn't just the "left" being critical, not anymore, there are many conservatives speaking up and being "critical," and I am one of those conservatives. You're afraid Joe, I am too but when people are afraid we have a tendency to give our power and common sense over to others without even thinking what we are doing, just like Germany did with Adolph Hitler and dissent was squeezed out of the country. Do we want that here? Posted by: Thomas on July 30, 2004 08:30 PM Flip: Rule of Law Flip: Pro Life Flip: Pro Life Flip: No Big Gov't Flip: Return Dignity to The White House after Clinton There's nothing sadder than a troll. Ignore 'im, everyone. This wonderful list was posted by "Snippy"over on DU just a few days ago. Bush says he fell off his bicycle because of the heavy rains and he watched on television on the morning of 9/11 as the first plane hit the first WTC tower and John McCain has an illegitimate Negro daughter and Bush would veto McCain-Feingold and the yawning boy was not there and was not yawning and besides he was standing some place else and Richard Clarke had complete access to Bush and Rice which proves that Clarke was out of the loop which is Clinton's fault but the White House revealed that Clarke briefed the press on background about Bush fighting terrorism which means that unnamed White House sources may not be identified even when Bush wants to and everyone except Bush himself knows where he was during his National Guard service but it was Clinton's fault that Bush did not show up for duty which was after Bush volunteered to go to Viet Nam but before he was no longer required to take a flight physical and about the same time that God ordered him to smite Saddam because the 70 lines of embryonic stem cells and more arsenic in the water and more mercury in the air prove that republican science is better than sound science and the Bush administration did not illegally conspire to illegally reveal the identity of a covert CIA operative which resulted in 2 million new jobs being created because democrats support terrorism and are not good Americans just as the Jews were not good Germans which is why Bush said he would veto the creation of both the Department of Homeland Security and the 9/11 Commission but now claims credit for their creation and the White House is cooperating with the 9/11 Commission which is why the White House withheld documents and called the republicans on the Commission before Clarke testified and why the White House is not coordinating the attacks on the integrity and bipartisanship of the Commission and why Bush and Cheney negotiated with the Commission that the two of them would testfy one time only but never again since the dental xrays prove that Bush spoke with the CIA director everyday and did not ignore either the repeated warnings of the dangers of al Qaeda and Osama or the August 2001 intelligence briefing specifically warning of the upcoming 9/11 attacks because the United States is a nation with a mission and that mission is to bring freedom to every single person in the world which will cut the deficit in half if you do not count those parts of the deficit which will increase under Bush which is Clinton's fault but the boxes from China were labeled "Made in USA" which resulted in 2.6 million new jobs being created even though the $400 billion Medicare prescription drug decorative turkey was not labeled $550 billion and was passed without bribery or criminal deception and was not criminally promoted by the Bush administration using taxpayers' money for propaganda purposes which proves that government spending under Bush has gone down if you do not count the increased government spending under Bush which is Clinton's fault just as acts of terrorism have decreased since 9/11 if you do not count the increase in the number of acts of terrorism and Bush's plane to Baghdad was spotted because before Saddam bought the uranium and became an "urgent" but not an imminent threat which is Clinton's fault Bush had no plans on his desk to invade Iraq since the invasion was not planned before Bush took office even though it was the subject of his first national security council meeting in February 2001 and in December 2001 when plans for the invasion were being finalized Bush said he was focused on the military operations in Afghanistan and then the Carrier Costume Party was too far offshore for the Navy to make a large enough "Mission Accomplished" banner to describe the WMD we have found in Iraq some of which Saddam was giving to Osama for following Saddam's plans and using Iraqi hijackers on 9/11 which is Clinton's fault but everyone who pays income taxes got a tax cut which created 3 million new jobs and allowed Iraqi oil revenue to pay for the cost of the reconstruction of Iraq after the invasion by a small number of troops who would be greeted with floral program related activities except for the dead and wounded troops who are being brought home secretly which is Clinton's fault since Bush is the one who hugs the mothers and the widows and the wives and the kids and since Bush does not watch television news he did not know about the republican torture pranks occurring in Iraq until he saw the pictures while watching television news and that is why Bush who will use the jawbone of an ass to force OPEC to open the spigots and who is responsible for good economic numbers but not bad economic numbers which are Clinton's fault wrote the poem that he did not write blaming Laura for dropping the dog.
http://electroniciraq.net/news/printer1570.shtml Posted by: wv on July 30, 2004 08:37 PMI've just finished reading todays postings. I have always enjoyed lurking and occassionally posting and what a disappointment to see that someone like "Joe" has brought his/her baiting to the site. It's apparent he/she just wants to argue. . .period. . .Really, what productive dialogue results in responding to such an inflexible, argumentative, confrontational individual. . ."Can we just ignore "Joe"! Posted by: KAP on July 30, 2004 08:43 PMThankye Kap. One has to wonder which is sadder, political astrologers or the one screaming at the political astrologers. I'm with you KAP. Right now this site is highjacked. Let's get on with astrology and visualizing lots of Blue. Posted by: Susan on July 30, 2004 08:48 PM$445 BILLION Deficit?????????!!!!!!!!!! Even after he inherited a huge huge surplus!! Bush has created big doo doo for the grandkids. We'll be suffering for years. Posted by: Laurie on July 30, 2004 08:50 PMJohn Kerry is scheduled to leave from Muskegon, MI on Monday (about 5 miles from me) via our car ferry to Milwaukee. I hope to see him, but the details of whether or not he will stop to speak have not been finalized. I hope he does. I would love to cheer him on. Posted by: Beverly on July 30, 2004 08:50 PMBoy has this site been freeped. Kerry must be doing way better than even any of us thought! Posted by: M. on July 30, 2004 08:55 PMJo: Thanks for the Kos link to Senate and House. Posted by: Beverly on July 30, 2004 08:57 PM
Wisdom and Truth flows through you veins. Thanks you for your take on things. You can be my Grandmother anytime - but The co-ordinates of shrub is all skewed and screwed up, joe.The whole world knows that in the last 4 years and it is time for this imbecile to No, there are no legal requirements-but a national leader in a world economy, and at the head of the world's greatest military needs to be deeply prepared and deeply ready to steer the ship of state. Would you put a new driver behind the wheel of a custom racecar? A new pilot to fly the Space Shuttle? An intern to do brain surgery? So it is with the United States: too damn big and powerful for amateurs to fly and lead. All of the great Presidents: George Washington, Lincoln, Jefferson, Clinton, JFK, Adams, even Wilson and FDR were men who valued learning and spent countless years studying their country, the world, and politics before taking on the White House. Truman was a Classisist who could talk about Ovid and the Founding Fathers with comsummate ease. And these men were President when technology, international relations, and social relations were far less complicated than they are now. Your idol spent years diving into a bottle and hoovering up cocaine, and God knows what else instead of reading books and studying politics under even conservative masters like Reagan. He hates being President so much that he runs from his job whenever possible. All of the greats loved their job, and yearned to do great things with the power they posessed. They had to be dragged away from their desks when a crisis or a challenge occurred. Why is Shrub running? He needs to prove to his daddy/mommy that he's not a failure, that he can do better. What man who loves his father would say that he doesn't get advice from Dad, a former President, but from a "higher Father" who won't criticize him or tell him no? Posted by: Carol on July 30, 2004 08:59 PMI thought the cons(ervatives) don't believe in astrology except the ronnie reagans, because GOD Sally, BREAKING: Hundreds of Millions Missing in Iraq Joe, the world has seen enough of Shrub to know that he is incompetent and childish, and does not deserve another term at the helm of the greatest country in the world. No amount of polishing can hide the fact that he is a lifelong failure who has once again failed abysmally. He is inarticulate, undiplomatic, ignorant. And our paymasters in China and Europe are waiting to see if we have the courage to toss his ass before they start calling in their loans. Posted by: Carol on July 30, 2004 09:14 PM" ...work on becoming better listeners rather than putting themselves on pedestals and refusing to hear a different point of view". OMG Joe, that's the prayer I send out to GWB and his administration every day!!! Posted by: on July 30, 2004 09:15 PMSally, Isabelle --- Isabelle, your comments on THK and her charts are music to my ears! Our country needs more strong women as role models, and I am looking forward to having an opinionated female in the White House again! Hopefully it will not be much longer (it's already been too long!) before we see one in the top position of leadership... Sally, the convention turned out to be wonderful and your analyses right on target. Can't imagine how you managed to turn out two wonderful articles so quickly and so timely, but as usual you did so in a fine and authentic manner. Your handling of the freeping is a model of politeness. You are very kind to provide this forum and most of us attempt to remember our manners when using the broadband. After all, we are guests... this is not "McDonald's" where you throw your money down and supersize your order! You are indeed a kind host, and I thank you for all the information and wonderful articles as well as the other authors you bring to the board. Very few of us would feel okay about wandering into a church or synagogue and standing and arguing with the folks present as to how they express themselves. But apparently in cyberspace some feel free to barge in any open door and argue and disrupt a thread of thought. I'm of an older generation, but even today I believe that is Joe, you will make no converts here... for, indeed we are biased against your POV. And while I would not suggest to you that you not express yourself, I will suggest that you not be so rude as to feel you have to address every post --- if your ego has that great a need, try spreading your views around --- there are plenty of forums in cyberspace. Namaste Posted by: Jo on July 30, 2004 09:15 PMI won't delete, I think he may be lonely and there is nothing wrong with a different opinion and he/she hasn't reached being rude or crude, just expressing what he thinks. Mundane astrology is the study of one person's energy upon the energy of events (or visa/versa) The entire collective country is going through a transformation (never easy) and when transformation comes our inclination is to hang onto the old way of doing things. The reason the war in Iraq is sooooo bad and not working out (neither is the Afghan war but we don't hear about that in this country) is "war" is an old response to events and Bush is doing the "old response to nearly everything," Bush has a Sun right on the US Sun tieing into the collective, when WE shift our understanding of the consequences of our responses to others and ourselves, then the President or leaders will be shifted. I listened to Barak Obama and his "one America" and unifying message and people saying his message was the new face of politics, as was Teresa Heinz Kerry's message about women being accepted as smart and well-informed, and if this is the new face of politics it is a very hopeful sign. It is past time for us (America) to be unified and demand honest answers from those who work for us, instead of us fighting each other. Posted by: Sally on July 30, 2004 09:20 PMInteresting article (with more to come, apparently) on Smirky's lawyer: http://www.legalunderground.com/2004/06/presidents_lawy.html Posted by: shylurker on July 30, 2004 09:21 PMWV, Namaste, Jo Posted by: Jo on July 30, 2004 09:23 PMJo, thank you so much for your kind words especially since I literally threw last night's article together. You know Jo, my last name is McDonald so this is "McDonald's" site and I so appreciate everyone's attitude and appreciation to this site and those who post here, you too Joe, just be polite to others and no obscenity. Posted by: Sally on July 30, 2004 09:24 PMJoe, It starts with a mental submission. This submission is in the spirit of total surrender of the self. This is parallel to the devotion one expresses before a chosen deity, also known as bhakti. The devotee who thus venerates with complete self-surrender is believed to partake the merits or qualities of the person or deity before whom he performs this submission. There is a prescription in the ancient texts known as Agamas that the worshipper of a deity must first become divine himself, for otherwise worship as a transaction would become invalid. A transaction can only be between equals, between individuals who share some details in common. Hence by performing namaste before an individual we recognize the divine spark in him. Further by facilitating our partaking of these divine qualities, namaste makes us aware of these very characteristics residing within our own selves. Simply put, namaste intimates the following: 'The God in me greets the God in you In other words, it recognizes the equality of all, and pays honor to the sacredness of all. Namaste, Jo Posted by: Jo on July 30, 2004 09:28 PMJoe, I can judge the results for myself. I don't claim to be President, nor do I want to be one. America has not fared well under Shrub, and does not need him. Like my guy, Dean, "we can do better", and we will do better-starting with Kerry/Edwards. Joe (and probably others may come) are here because the predictions of Shrub's uraveling are bearing out. If we were wrong, they would let us pontificate in peace-and with a shrug. Why are they stubbornly clinging to Shrub despite all of the evidence that he simply is lacking as a President? A theory that I have had is that we are dealing with a stubborn macho cult. Shrub somehow connects with their sense of manhood without threatening them with competence-he is really like them-inept and unable to think deeply and with power. They need him in power to validate that. A real President-Kerry, Gore, Clinton, (Dean someday) makes them feel inadequate-they are successiful, intelligent, loved by the ladies, and have many friends. Your normal couch potato male feels inadequate in comparison to that. Posted by: Carol on July 30, 2004 09:28 PMhttp://images.ucomics.com/comics/po/2004/po040728.gif Posted by: Pat C on July 30, 2004 09:29 PMJoe, "it is obvious I have to write 10x as much to get my view point heard. So I guess if that bothers you, you could choose not to read it or go to another site." If you will 'listen' to other posters, they are telling you they oppose your point of view. Point is, this is a small website, and you are taking up alot of broadband... why? Namaste Posted by: Jo on July 30, 2004 09:31 PMWow! The LA Times has one whopper of an article. Truthout has posted it, so you won't have to go through the hassle of signing up with the LAT: http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/072904L.shtml Posted by: shylurker on July 30, 2004 09:31 PMLosing America: Confronting a Reckless and Arrogant Presidency by Senator Robert C. Byrd
Ahhh, joe uses that liberal word as so many of the cons-repugs, who cna't debate and win when I I think that those that love Bush are running scared over last night's speech and much of America responding favorably to it. Otherwise why would there be so much invective, fear, panic and immaturity? Kerry's a threat, no doubt about it and, if Bush's Black Box Voting Scheme doesn't highjack the Election --again--, we'll finally get back on track with President John F. Kerry. Love the respectful, well-balanced, polite and astrologically intelligent comments, guys (and gals). Keep it up. :-) Jonathan Posted by: Jonathan on July 30, 2004 09:32 PMSally, And now, I apologize, for I have taken up more than enough space. Namaste Posted by: Jo on July 30, 2004 09:34 PMJo, I knew this joe being one of those cons/repugs Blah, blah, blah. Yawn. Posted by: M. on July 30, 2004 09:40 PMhttp://www.alternet.org/election04/19389/ Colin McNickle, the political wife-beater for billionnaire Richard Mellon-Scaife's right-wing attack machine, has set his sights on Teresa Heinz-Kerry – good thing she's willing to stand up to it. Posted by: Pat C on July 30, 2004 09:40 PMI've been just lurking for a while because so much of the discussion over the past several weeks has not really focused on astrology and, as I've said before, I'm not sophisticated enough politically to participate in most of the discussions. Until the 2000 election, I considered myself an independent although I voted Democratic more often than not. I preferred to look at the candidate and not the party. The Republican party has moved away from me and told me they do not want me. They no longer offer the likes of Lincoln, Eisenhower or T.Roosevelt. Instead they offer a "Constitution, what Constitution?" attitude. I do not nor can I ever believe that the current administration has been annointed by "God." John Kerry, John Edwards, Bill Clinton and all the Democrats that spoke at the convention have appealed to my idealism that disappeared with 9/11. John Kerry's whole demeanor (the same demeanor that cause some to call him dull) make me feel safe and secure and that I can trust him. Maybe too idealistic and naive but I have a sense of hope that George W. Bush can never give. He's too much like a little boy playing soldier. And I would advise any GWB supporters who might be peeking in to play nice. Discussion is good, animosity is not and we are all guests on this board. Sally, for a quick article, this one is really good and I have to agree with your conclusion. Posted by: Teresa on July 30, 2004 09:41 PMAll of that has been posted in previous articles. READ. Posted by: on July 30, 2004 09:42 PMJo, you just make me laugh and smile, what a joy you are, you don't live in the West by any chance do you? I would drive to meet you for coffee. In fact there are several on this site I would drive to share coffee with them (or tea) Posted by: Sally on July 30, 2004 09:43 PMSaying that all you can do to defend the COWARDS- Not only these cowards-shrub,cheny,rummy sped away It never ceases to amaze me how utterly and inescapably powerful WORDS are. A simple statement like "Kerry will win" or "Bush will win" can send people into fits of rage that run down their arms, bleed into their fingers and spill themselves all over their keyboards and eventually into our minds. But they're just words. Yes, these Words indicate our thoughts, maybe even our beliefs. And, yes, those of us with a great deal of hope tend to cling to them and protect them from others who might hurt them and, in effect, us. But, again, they're just words. And these Words, here, are on CyberSpace. If you don't like what I read, you can S-C-R-O-L-L down and save yourself the rage, the anger, the unpleasantness. Or, if you're curious, you can read them and understand that this is my Opinion and not yours, so you need not internalize it, be affected by it and feel as if You're Right and I'm Wrong. 'Cause they're just Words. Everyday letters, familiar characters we've known since childhood, scrambled together in different patterns. They're just Words. And what I write here will eventually disappear and not matter. Civilizations rise and fall. The World goes on. Stuff we have cluttered around us will someday be nothing but dust. Just as the cherished mementos of lives lived 1500, 700, 300, 200 years ago crumbled and turned to dust. Lives begin, are lived, and end. So, all that we think is important now, in the end, isn't. So, if someone disagrees with you, you have a choice: Does that person's Opinion have any validity. Yes. Do you need to read it, experience it, swallow it whole and make it a part of you. No. These moments we live tick by one after the other and can never be recaptured. Use them wisely. And remember: they're only Words. Jonathan Posted by: Jonathan on July 30, 2004 09:58 PMIn any event, Saturn in the Twelfth natally is tough for an executive. It stirs up too many insecurities for genuine courage (said by someone with Saturn on her Ascendant). A successful leader needs Saturn in a location where the energies can be focused outward in a constructive manner. And Cancer, with its natural overprotectiveness and retreat doesn't help. Indeed, Cancer is in its detriment here-a sign that instead of structuring, we get inhibition. Shrub would have been better off as a monk in a monastery, meditating quietly while pruning the rosebushes. The ordered life, with its security and privacy would have suited him well. Cancer there would have led him to simply make his monastic cell more homelike. The tragedy was that he was born in a family that demanded traits that he simply could not have-Leo traits of charisma and leadership, Scorpio traits of cunning and strategy, Libra traits of charm. And the second Saturn return asks the question-how have you handled your true adulthood? Have you done you life's work properly, and are prepared to leave a legacy to the next generation? For the next state is the Sage stage of imparting wisdom, the Grandmother/Grandfather/Great Uncle/Great Aunt/ who builds for the ages instead of for the family. Shrub finds himself at this return handling responsibilities that he never really wanted in the first place, never having done the hard work (Saturn) of recovery, and facing the fact that he may never fulfill his father's ambitions for a true legacy. And at a time where he probably would rather give in to his natural inclinations to retreat (and probably would have spent this year going to them if he was wired differently), he has to actively play the Sun role of leader and ask the fickle public to give him one more chance as the Sun King. Posted by: Carol on July 30, 2004 09:58 PMI post my thoughts for others to READ, joe for your info, I don't have to read them, joe, the great AUTHOR, who becomes an author as soon as Bhakti mentioned he has written BOOKS! Posted by: on July 30, 2004 10:00 PMWhat chart are you getting this from? A chart you charted yourself? If so what were the birthdates/locations you used to conclude them? Posted by: Carol on July 30, 2004 10:05 PMIt is very easy to comprehend, joe when you don't know what 'word' is a profanity to ask Sally to delete, when what I wrote has no profanity and if you did find any, spell it out here you great author! Posted by: on July 30, 2004 10:08 PMHear, hear, Jonathan. Nicely said. Could the person who keeps leaving their name off of their posts start identifying him or herself? It's nice to know who we are talking to. It's nice to see you are back, Jo. Posted by: Teresa on July 30, 2004 10:10 PMGeorge W. Bush was born on July 6, 1946 at 7:26 AM EDT in New Haven, Connecticut. When I still participated in my offline astrology group, we would sometimes attract Joe; sometimes they were fundies who thought we worshiped the devil, sometimes they were simply argumentative. I believe we attracted them because our group, meeting in a very conservative area, represented another way of thinking that was very threatening to their enforced consensus. Posted by: Carol on July 30, 2004 10:16 PMNo Joe, Astrology will not get Kerry elected. The people will. All the people he's pissed off and alienated (say like the world) here in the United Stated. Like blacks, women, gays, teachers, librarians, workers, police, firemen, army, navy, marines, CIA, FBI, NAACP, moderate republicans and on and on and on.
I will only say this once, and then I'm using my time more wisely: Dissent is fine if the tone is respectful and not argumentative, challenging or otherwise "mean spirited". The dissenting views I've seen recently on this Board have been all of those things and more. We welcome opposing points of view. In fact, the astrologers here more than likely appreciate someone questioning their work as it nudges them to dig deeper and do better. But when the post, the "opposing view", is filled with opinions, beliefs, thoughts, etc. bordering on name-calling, words that are intended to hurt or demean, or a "I'm right, You're wrong" attitude, then it's just a waste of time. And the same goes for those that disagree with the Opposing View. Disagree, but be adults about it. Please feel free EVERYONE to question the work done here. But don't think that to have an Opposing View you have to belittle or besmirch or demean anyone or their beliefs here. And no matter what is said after I post this, this has, in fact, happened. Jonathan Posted by: Jonathan on July 30, 2004 10:19 PMDon't get all that excited,joe, I meant 'great' sarcatically, don't get all carried away by this. "No Joe, Astrology will not get Kerry elected. The people will. All the people he's pissed off and alienated (say like the world) here in the United Stated. Like blacks, women, gays, teachers, librarians, workers, police, firemen, army, navy, marines, CIA, FBI, NAACP, moderate republicans and on and on and on." And you think John Kerry hasn't pissed off huge blocks of Americans? Dream on, he has quite an extensive voting record that is going to be exposed that will alienate him from MANY Americans. "Even if Kerry is not our first choice, we don't care, we're pissed and staying there until he goes. And we are all together this time. That's why Kerry is going to win." And there lies the problem, it could be Saddam Hussein or even Adolph Hitler running, and since there is so much hatred for Bush, he would probably still get elected. That is NO way to elect a politician. It really is time to take a good look at your candidate and start questioning him before you run off on a rage and vote for someone who may be a potential disaster for this country. We've had George Bush for four years, and he hasn't nuked us into oblivion, we haven't had another terrorist attack, we have a more prosperous economy, we have better health care, better education. I'd say he is doing a pretty good job. You go, Raj!! Posted by: shylurker on July 30, 2004 10:27 PMAgain, more Republican talking points. We used to run those types away from our real-life group because we simply would not buy their talking points and stuck to our astrological guns. Not only that, but we resisted making them leaders, insisting that everyone had a right to their opinion. They would never really come back after that. Friends: let me inject a little Alice Bailey in the discussion: You have heard of the Rays- Well, Sagittarius and Pisces represent the Sixth Ray of Faith and Idealism. With Pluto in Sagittarius and Uranus in Pisces, what we are seeing is the mass effect of the negative Sixth Ray in action. Posted by: Carol on July 30, 2004 10:33 PMshrub doing a great job, you are NOT SERIOUS(like Astrology will make the FREE WILL to overcome the Oh Goddess, it a Full Blue Moon. Flip: Better Health care Flip: WMD in Iraq Flip: prosperous economy Free will only works if there is a will that can act freely. The tragedy of a lifetime of unrecovered substance abuse and a life with little real structure is that there has been little of the deep thinking necessary to be captain of his life. His thinking and feeling and instincts are still that of a child or teenager, not a man who has developed a deep well of knowledge and philosophy to draw on during troubled times. Combine that with the enormous stresses of the Presidency, and he has little capacity to do more than simply hang on for dear life. Yes, a monk and some leaders can do differently through conscious awareness of the forces and energies in their chart, and a lifetime of mental discipline. But Shrub is not like that at all. He flies off the handle at reporters who ask him tough questions, gives goofy nicknames to reporters, refuses to read anything unless Condi gives it to him. Posted by: Carol on July 30, 2004 10:42 PMThe more everyone blows wind at this guy the more it's going to fill up his sails. It's obvious that neither him nor we are going to be changing our points of view based on the arguments being produced by both sides. No matter which way you dress it up this is circular logic, a waste of bandwidth and a blatent insult to the hostess. Still, in the spirit of cyber~ettiquette I swear to never, ever again use the phrase "giggling murderer" in the same sentence as GWB at this forum. Now let's just take away the one thing he wants (that would be attention) and he'll hop away to another lilypad where people will play with him. Negative attacks: I hope you are all studying this well. This is the real deal. This is a troll. The right wing actually pays people to do just what is being done right here. There is no honor in it, they just want to win, period. Sometimes rude is in the agenda rather than the words. Posted by: Pat C on July 30, 2004 10:47 PM
I was born Jan 4, 1930 at 5:51PM 79W23 43N39 Posted by: wv on July 30, 2004 10:48 PM Hey folks..... lets cool it,Joe has a right to his opinion but he is clearly getting a response that is doing no one any good. Thanks for the good work Chas! Posted by: Pat C on July 30, 2004 11:05 PM
Come now, give the time of birth and the longitude By the way Jeffrey has a web site and has written Joe, Sally and other astrologers have said that if Bush wins, which I have always believed was a possibility, that he would not last 6-8 months. I don't know exactly what will happen but he would not last. I don't believe anyone here thinks that astrology is the end all but I do believe we are confident of a Kerry victory, that is, if he makes it to the election, which in itself is not assured. Posted by: Laurie on July 30, 2004 11:13 PMLaurie, Wouldn't it be fun if this freeper was Ann Coulter who probably has lots of time on her hands now that she is fired from USA Today. Posted by: on July 30, 2004 11:28 PM
favorite trump line of Kerry's: .."we need to get on God's side" (paraphrase) It socked the bushego of 'god is on my/our side' mission statements, etc Joe you are correct in as much as astrology is not an exact science, not that the information is not there but that we as astrologers either don't see or understand the information presented. The astrologers writing on this site have over 150 years of collective experience, I alone have 37 years of painstakingly studying the math, the energies and how they apply to events and people and have had through my career a high degree of accuracy. A presidential race however is a bit more complicated, the 2000 race is a good example. I stated at the time that the winner would be the loser and the loser the ultimate winner. Most astrologers could see a tight race, problems in a couple of states but it never crossed our mind that the Supreme Court would take it out of the voters hands, because there is no history of that happening and we didn't look at the overall picture. It is essential in a presidential race to look at the candidates, their birthdate and their families, the time of the acceptance of the nomination, the day and time of the inauguration and most importantly the data for the US, this is a sampling of what mundane astrologers look at to arrive at their predictions, plus progressions, solar returns, asteroids, and fixed stars. As you can see this is a great deal to synthesize sometimes mistakes are made. The fact that mistakes are made is not as surprising as the fact that a good astrologer makes very few, that's the surprise. There isn't any doubt that this race will be close and depending upon the integrity of the voting machines, which is right now in question, Kerry/Edwards has the edge over GWB. That said, I can tell you that the next 4 years has the potential of being as bad or worse for this country and whoever is President will take the blame and perhaps the fall for the problems. There are variables out there that cannot be assessed, the dishonesty of the voting machines, the Supreme Court, Martial Law, a severe earthquake, terrorists attacks, an economic crash (which is a real possibility in Oct.) a serious scandal for either candidate (another real possibility) these are all variables and must be considered. There is still 100 days until Election and in politics that's a long way off. Astrologically those 100 days show to be dramatic. Posted by: Sally on July 30, 2004 11:41 PMJoe, 3 must be a big number for you? With that birth time and year and Gemini being the 3rd sign . . . I have a hard time understanding how anyone could choose Bush over someone with the stature and integrity of Kerry. And I know you feel the opposite. I am agreeing to disagree, as I have had lots of practice with a few family members!! I have been all over the web getting predictions from astrologers and MOST, but not all, think it is a Kerry victory. The ones that say Bush wins usually refer to his Jupiter declination conjunct something (maybe the Sun's declination) on election day. Maybe that merits some looking at. I truly believe another term for Bush will spell disaster not only for our country but for the world as a whole. I am not Bush-bashing, I am expressing my true feelings. Posted by: Laurie on July 30, 2004 11:46 PMHey Joe, it's Friday night. Dontcha got a date or something better to do? So glad Bush got him. Posted by: on July 30, 2004 11:58 PMmay i play too? flip: we must be a humble nation in spite of what the cat dun drug in today, i am grateful for the rapid and insightful analysis of last night's speech. many moons ago, i lived in ann arbor, so it just feels right to say GO BLUE early and often. best to all Posted by: mr kite on July 31, 2004 12:00 AMAnyone who has watched and understood the past eleven years and is still supporting the Bush/neocons must have taken up one of the most horrid habits of the cheap labor conservatives. They have agreed to outsource their common sense, disbelieved in science, and are stumbling on to the end of life as we know it. The environment is unimportant to them, and kicking off the developing economic debt to their heirs is of no concern to them. There is karma, and it does come around. Posted by: Pat C on July 31, 2004 12:01 AMAll neocons accuse others of doing exactly what they themselves do on a daily basis. Posted by: Pat C on July 31, 2004 12:06 AMhigh coup: arrive here to learn
Maybe you can focus on some of the other computers on that bank where you work. I won't miss you. Posted by: Pat C on July 31, 2004 12:09 AMSally, for that matter, all the sciences are inexact, as I mentioned before replying to Jonathan's dillemma.Medicine says one day coffee is good for you, the next it will raise your bp; joe, you make all these grandoise like statements You still haven't defended the cowards, because you can't, joe, but is very quick to defend shrub on this global warming issue but your defence rings so hollow like the other bigger 'baal' idol Bush isn't just another viewpoint. Bush is dangerous to humanity. You are not just another viewpoint. Posted by: Pat C on July 31, 2004 12:18 AMdon't give me this 'balanced' poppycock like the con fox news calling itself, which was exposed completely bare by the GREAT Al Franken in his latest book and to add insult injury, got the fox Against my better judgement I am going to answer you for the last time. First of all you seem not to read my posts and jump to conclusions that have been addressed in the post, such as "mistakes are made" I said that and if you had read what I wrote you would have seen it. Secondly, the thing that is frustrating is not that you've been able to refute a "liberal" stance, but that you don't seem to have any concrete data, or logical arguments to back your opinions. And that is the very thing liberals object to regarding conservatives, they don't have a reasonable or logical argument to state their case. They just throw out absolute statements like that are so incredulous it leaves one without a desire to talk to them. There is no debate, no give and take, no credible facts to back themselves up, nothing. Anyway Joe, I hope you have a nice evening and this is my last response to you, if the others want to continue this back and forth they have more of a stomach for it than I do. Posted by: Sally on July 31, 2004 12:24 AMJoe, ok things must be really bad if we use astrology to figure things out. If that's what you want to believe. NOW you're being rude and a bit abusive, Joe. And I think it's time for the Moderator to step in and bring some order back to this. If you have something to offer ASTROLOGICALLY that supports your belief that Bush will win in November, please share it. If not, treat the people here with respect and courtesy. Jonathan Posted by: Jonathan on July 31, 2004 12:25 AMSince you have a degree Joe, you will undedrstand this. despicable SYLLABICATION: PRONUNCIATION: ADJECTIVE: ETYMOLOGY: OTHER FORMS: Just saw your Post, Sally. Thank you. You must have been writing as I was writing. Thank you, thank you, thank you. Truth be told, I'm still happy about the coverage Kerry's speech is getting. Looks like he knocked it out of the Park. And the Democratic Convention this year, with Barak Obama, President Clinton and Al Gore, Sharpton's wonderfully impassioned speech, all of it was great. Really enjoyed myself. And how wonderful a First Lady will Teresa Heinz Kerry be?! If she can do for America what she's done for Pittsburgh, we'll be in amazing shape after their 8 years have passed. :-) Jonathan Posted by: Jonathan on July 31, 2004 12:28 AMSally, you're most sensible; only if the other who hope to win an argument blurting out 'liberal' Also COWARDS will NOT GET elected either even by stealing or throwing wool over voters' eyes;so this imbecile and his cronies will be thrown under the heap of history very soon and let the celebrations BEGIN for the sensible liberals! Posted by: on July 31, 2004 12:43 AMAny one notice that Mars last night by being at 22 leo was exactly conjoined Kerrys progressed Jupiter and that the transiting Sun was exactly trine his progressed midheaven? Is another real good sign we have an accurate birth time for him. Pat C., Light and peace Posted by: Jo on July 31, 2004 12:46 AMApologize for my poor editing.Dont do this often enough to get the bugs out of my writing. Posted by: Chas on July 31, 2004 12:49 AMHeya Jonathan, I'm folding a bit about Mama T into the Blue Moon coming up. My repub bosses cracked jokes today that they need to brush up on their Portuguese (excuse my spelling) speaking skills for the next First Lady. Loved it. Jonathan, I loved Sharpton. You could tell which speakers knocked it out of the park those were the ones who have received the most negative press. I heard the press secretary for Reagan say that Obama's was the best because he did not use one cliche or hackneyed phrase. He speculated that if Obama writes his own speeches look out and if he has a speech writer he needs to keep that person on his payroll. Sharpton's imagery at the end of Ray Charles was just fantastic. Timing is everything Jonathan and I do believe the timing is right and this convention showed that, the unity of the democrats (and god knows they have not been unified in 30 or 40 years) seemed to freak everyone out, including the pundits, even the liberal pundits. So it's going to be an exciting campaign season. Posted by: Sally on July 31, 2004 12:57 AMChas, thank you for all the fascinating input!! Don't care how many boo-boos, just keep it all coming!! Has anyone looked at the stars for Bush's acceptance speech, probably around 10:00 p.m. as well, September 2nd? Oh my gosh Chas, I completely missed it and it was right there, that just reinforces his nomination and potential. Posted by: Sally on July 31, 2004 12:59 AMI did look at it Laurie, but I don't want to comment until I have the exact time. Posted by: Sally on July 31, 2004 01:01 AMHey , this has been a good lesson on how the Repubs stall in the House and Senate. Jeez, taking a break and all H-E- doublehockey sticks broke loose. Full moon. I am still on cloud 9 over those amazingly intelligent, strategic and well spoken speeches this week. That's some talent pool. It will attract positive talented people. Happy Blue Moon. Stay Happy. The Neo-Cons seem desperate and worried. I would be too. We are changing the record groove. The old spin just became obsolete. Like the way of 78's, 33's, 45's. It does not play on the uplifted, awakened understanding anymore. (((Jo))) Posted by: Pat C on July 31, 2004 01:19 AMEverybody please scroll up and understand what this guy is doing. He's alternating between being civil and being abusive and every time he switches somebody is stepping up to duke it out with him. It's a standard GOP tactic, you may recognize it as a microcosm of what's happening between the candidates. I've read the posters here at Astroworld debate on the proper use of the term "Metaphysics." I've read the astrologers answer questions normal people wouldn't think to even ask. There is simply no honor to be either gained or lost by engaging this guy in conversation. We are beyond this point. His opinions on astrology are worth less than his opinions on politics. We've given him enough pleasure for one sitting and wasted enough bandwidth to feed his need to be the center of attention. Morgana, we're looking forward to the Blue Moon and your analysis! btw, I think THK speaks five or six languages fluently, so your bosses don't need to brush up on anything...language-wise anyway... Didn't she look outstanding last night! Very few women can wear white --- she looked very chic, I thought. Bl-ue moon, Morgana music... who could ask for anything more? Posted by: Jo on July 31, 2004 01:23 AMJoe, you bring the words of Bob Dylan to mind..."I wish for just one moment that I could be you and you could be me so you could see what a drag it is to see you." I'm not trying to be mean. I truly mean that in a sympathetic way. But I don't expect you to understand that. Posted by: abilene on July 31, 2004 01:30 AMDommael that's exactly right. It's an old trick. Posted by: on July 31, 2004 01:43 AMThe most recent Zogby poll shows deeper trouble for President George W. Bush beyond just the horserace. Mr. Bush has fallen in key areas while Senator John Kerry has shored up numerous constituencies in his base. The Bush team's attempted outreach to base Democratic and swing constituency has shown to be a failure thus far, limiting his potential growth in the electorate. The ugly details- What does Joe have to say about this? Posted by: abilene on July 31, 2004 01:43 AMJoe! In the words of Teresa Heinz Kerry. "Shove off!" We love John Kerry. Posted by: Lorraine on July 31, 2004 01:55 AMWow, the posts are all very revealing. To both sides of the very verbal fence, I offer something to reflect upon. Fear is so powerful ... and makes us do and say things we would normally not say or do. Viewing these posts I keep getting one image flashing before me. View http://www.apple.com/trailers/lions_gate/open_water/ Peace, http://www.pressconnects.com/today/opinion/stories/op073004s106715.shtml Hard to argue with the reality in 'Fahrenheit' Fahrenheit 9/11 is an embarrassing movie. Or it should be. It should be embarrassing to the Cheney/Bush Gang, but those people are beyond embarrassment. It should be embarrassing to the spineless Democrats in the U.S. Senate, not one of whom had the moral courage to co-sign a bill of particulars prepared by African-American members of Congress and others protesting the disenfranchisement of black voters in Florida, a blatant act that enabled Bush, with the help of his brother, Jeb, Florida Secretary of State Katherine Harris and five members of the U.S. Supreme Court to steal the presidency. It should be embarrassing to the national media -- print and electronic -- who lacked the intellectual courage to show us what Michael Moore shows us in this movie. And it should be especially embarrassing to the millions of Americans who fail to or refuse to see Bush for what he is: an inarticulate puppet for a corrupt, cynical band of neo-conservative opportunists led by Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice and Wolfowitz. The sweet singers of the far right and their followers have tried to make much of perceived errors in Fahrenheit. I say perceived, because in some cases they are the only ones who see them. Example: Moore supposedly claims in the film that members of the bin Laden family in the United States were allowed to fly home to Saudi Arabia after 9/11 before the ban on commercials flights out of the country was lifted. But the film does not make that claim. And the Saudis went out on private planes, not commercial flights. Moore does question the wisdom of allowing relatives of the man who masterminded the attacks to leave the country so soon after the event. But then when you look at the close ties, especially the money ties, that bind the Bushes and the Saudi establishment, including the bin Ladens, you understand the preferential treatment. More... Posted by: Pat C on July 31, 2004 02:11 AMSally, do you think at this point, according to his chart, that bush wants to be reelected? Posted by: abilene on July 31, 2004 02:21 AMI wonder what Kerry will say about this. http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0407/30/wbr.00.html Britain at Odds With Bush Administration; JIM BOULDEN, CNN CORRESPONDENT (voice-over): It's being seen as retaliation, the announcement last week's by Britain's defense secretary, Geoff Hoon, that a European company won a $1 billion contract to supply unmanned surveillance drones. The loser was U.S. manufacturer Northrop Grumman. Why? Because London is accusing Washington of unfair trade practices when it comes to defense contracts. DAVID MULHOLLAND, "JANE'S DEFENCE WEEKLY": The U.K. government thought when they joined the U.S. IN Iraq that they would be viewed more favorably. But ,in fact, no. The U.S. is still saying, oh, but we can't trust our good allies the Brits. BOULDEN: That anger boiled over in a letter dated June 16 from Hoon to U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. Hoon complained that legislation now working its way through Congress will make it even harder for non-U.S. firms to compete for American defense contracts. If it passes, Hoon warned Britain would have to have an exemption or consider whether to continue buying from U.S. defense firms. More.... Posted by: Pat C on July 31, 2004 02:40 AMAbilene that is a very good question. In 1992 I could not get over how apathetic Bush Sr. seemed to be, and I thought he acted like a man who didn't want to win. Since 1992 I have watched the Republican "attack dogs" and I realized that Bush thought they would take care of Clinton with the Jennifer Flowers situation. It was a "plan" they followed for 8 years in their attempt to get Clinton. I think they were shocked when Clinton actually won. Bush, Jr. could be taking the same road. On a sub-conscious basis I have to wonder if he has the stomach for it anymore. This presidency has not turned out to be something a former cheerleader would enjoy. His father has shored him up and gotten things for him all his life and Bush has self-destructed on every single thing his father gave him, I have wondered since the election (which his father brought to him) if he would self-destruct through this campaign. I think he might be keep as far away from Karl Rove's attacks as possible so he looks as if his hands are clean, but I think he consciously will go all out to win. I would absolutely look for a scandal involving Kerry put out there and I rather believe it will happen close to the beginning of the Republican Convention or right after. Posted by: Sally on July 31, 2004 02:56 AMGosh, guys...I was feeling quite hurt and embarrassed to realize that Joe is a fellow Gemini. (me...June 7, 1943, Honolulu, Hawaii...by Caesarean, 4:10 pm double wartime...anything else? 0h yeh...that Venus thing on June 8 happened right ON my Sun/Saturn conjunction, so I think I have mellowed quite a bit since that day, which was really QUITE a wonderful one, the energy was divine - quite a bit different from the Pluto opp/Saturn which happened 2 years earlier right on my Sun/Saturn which gave me SHINGLES.) I'd like to add some concrete stuff to this discussion....my dislike of Bushonomics (I don't even have to go THERE about W himself, as it would be repetitive) comes from experience. I lost everything in the first Bush regime...my home, my savings, my career, I was audited by the IRS for a tax shelter my crooked accountant put me into,and I ended up in Chapter 13 bankruptcy. That recession, the lack of support for ordinary people, was a rip to the fabric of my being, if not to my actual body. Under Clinton, I clawed my way back, got a new start (I had been a men's fashion illustrator; my new career switch was to storyboard/comp illustrator for SF ad agencies) and I was doing ok, considering that I came from owing huge amounts of money and having no cash for months of 1993, to about half of what I had been making pre Bush 1....actually, the Reagan years. Those economics and the actual ripping off by my accountant, who kept trying to get me to join the Republican Party, just devastated me. And here we are AGAIN....no work, no advertising, just day one from 14 years ago, all over again. Still in Chapter 13, though....and had to give up my health insurance, which I only had for less than 4 years, as it tripled when I turned 60....if not for an uncle, I would be on the streets. This is what Bushonomics does....this is why the dark cloud of grief we all felt in 2000 was SO real to me...."Uh Oh....here we go again." I have nothing of material value other than portables to lose now...no IRAs, no savings, no real estate. Why would I think the Bushes are great men? Why? I'm sure Joe would have a great reply for me, but I'm sure not about to buy it in this lifetime or any of the 1000 I've had on this planet or any of the other planets I've had a life on (honest, past life regression, surprised the hell outta me)
A pause that refreshes: "I come humbly to the bamboo grove - Wang Wei (700-760) We had just unloaded my Dad's furnishings and belongings in his new nest here... Soothsayer and I were driving to return a handtruck, when he turns to me and says "grandma, I don't think we ever really die." Don't you, I said. That's very profound, where did you get that idea? "Well, grandma, every adventure just leads to an even greater adventure." Silence. (thank you little soothsayer) [when the student is ready, the teacher will appear. I have asked for decades for teacher(s). We do not always know the form in which our requests will be answered!] Namaste Pat C.... re your post....I am not defending the Senators: you wrote.... Just noting that the reason they did that is because, seeing that Bush would get the nod of the Supreme Court, they cut a deal....the Dems wouldn't ask for a recount if the Repugs would allow them to work "bipartisan" (not be SHUT OUT) of the next 4 years. Fat lot of good it did them....and Al Gore had to preside over that scene. It was awful, and sickening and stupid. They sold out. Almost the worse part of that movie to me.... Posted by: judi on July 31, 2004 03:03 AMI keep wanting to add...that 2000 election had a retrograde Mercury operating. Could it get ANY MORE clear? Posted by: judi on July 31, 2004 03:04 AMOh mah gawd, guys ~ are ya'll following Josh Marshall's blog? "It's certainly true that Mr. Kerry said certain things in his war protestor days that can now be used against him with some audiences. But until he was well into middle-age President Bush's most noteworthy public utterances seem to have been limited to various invocations and inflections of 'par-TAY' and reciting the alphabet under legal compulsion." I'm lovin' it!!! Yes, and Andromeda strained, and brought forth....Joe. Posted by: judi on July 31, 2004 03:28 AMwow, leave this site for a day and it explodes. this is great: 'kind jo' and 'obnoxious joe.' joe, you be trippin my man. seriously, you need to get out more and smell the roses. are you here on a mission? it's not that you disagree, it's your weird notion that since you see your views as a miniority, you have to post 10 x's as much. you make your point loud and clear so stop being such an oinker with the space. why don't you go over to democraticunderground.com and lay outsome of your trash talk. they have sharper elbows that the more evolved and sophisticated folks here. Posted by: mike on July 31, 2004 03:47 AMoooh, prediction for the 'predestined future'...joe will continue to hog space and be obnoxious! Posted by: mike on July 31, 2004 03:49 AMJoe, let's talk about astrology for a minute, now that you have brought up the subject and for the second or third time mentioned predestination or the equivalent of --- Astrology is NOT about predestination. That is a misconception. This board does not attempt to teach astrology... however, you will find a wide spectrum of folks here, from newbies to beginners to students to experts. If you have given the discipline (and it is a discipline) a fling and studied it even very little, you will have found that astrologers are constantly having to defend themselves against the notion of PREDICTION or FORECAST. The view is that the transits offer opportunities, possibilities... we make the choices, individually and collectively. Our choices make changes like ripples in a pond, so that enough ripples will sweep away the opportunity, or the obstacle. The potential, the opportunity, the possibility of John Forbes Kerry becoming President are looking very good... according to his transits, according to the chart of the moment of his acceptance last night, according to other charts which are reflected in numerous articles in the archives. We are not twisting the transits to obtain an outcome we wish for... we see in the patterns an opportunity to obtain what we wish for... We are not so stupid as to believe that astrology will elect John Kerry or George Bush. We believe the people will elect John Kerry, if the election is not stolen through the computer ballot boxes. On the other hand, daily interactions with some members of my own family and a review of the comments of the pundits on TV indicate that SOME believe Bush is wonderful, great and god- appointed no matter what recent havoc he creates. If you truly wish to dialog (and at this point I must say I am very skeptical on that point) you might do just that... dialog... ask a question about the analyses in the articles or comment on a post with some firm facts or sources. Most of us here attempt to provide a link for our political comments and astrological information for our chart analyses. I suggest you re-read your posts if you don't think they were antagonistic. And you might want to read some of the articles and comments in the archives. None of us here agree on everything. Contrary to your assessment, we bring a great deal of diversity to the table. As to your post above: We hope to see George Bush defeated in November and John Kerry elected as President of these United States of America. Please show me the facts 'showing how wrong that future really is.' Peace
Joe, sally, thanks for the encouragement. Regarding your suggestion, here is a start. mike (channeling guido perhaps) said here are the possibilities for realizing sally's prediction that bush is headed for crawford soon! (3) the economy starts to drift or the europeans make a little mischief to hassle bush; VOILA from a Republican news wire service: Posted on Fri, Jul. 30, 2004 U.S. Economy Slows Drastically in Spring MARTIN CRUTSINGER Associated Press WASHINGTON - The U.S. economy slowed dramatically in the spring to an annual growth rate of 3 percent, as consumers, worried about higher gasoline prices, cut back their spending to the weakest pace in three years, the Commerce Department reported Friday. The April-June advance in the gross domestic product, the country's output of goods and services, was below the 3.8 percent increase many economists had expected and was significantly down from a revised 4.5 percent growth rate in the first three months of the year. The administration, counting on a rebounding economy to bolster President Bush's re-election prospects, insisted the second-quarter slowdown was only temporary and forecast that growth would rebound in the second half of the year. ---------------------- http://www.thestate.com/mld/thestate/business/9281921.htm nancy talked about an economic setback that would impact the elections. well, here tis one possibility.
http://www.astrowisdom.com/thisfullmoon.htm Posted by: on July 31, 2004 04:46 AMah... joe,.. like mike I think maybe you need to chill and not get your self all tangled up in those astrological points you are plotting.I have already told you where you can find Bushs chart at astrodatabank.com joe, you're pulling our chain...that's not nice. show some respect and stop the teasing. it's not 'better by hand,' you're just messing with people. i'm off to see 'harold and kumar.' later all ps. i'm not one of the 'evolved and sophisticated folks here' Posted by: mike on July 31, 2004 04:58 AMGWB birth data. 7/6/1946 7:26amEDT 41N18 72W55 Posted by: Chas on July 31, 2004 05:00 AMPeople, for the love of Mike (and Guido, too), quit abetting this bottom-feeder. Thnx! Posted by: shylurker on July 31, 2004 05:01 AMSaturn conjunct Sun (now), a depressive and introspective aspect. Ask this Libra how she felt back in 1989 as she had to leave college. In orb to feel it...square Libra Moon...not very happy either. Neptune opposition Mercury...adds substance to the allegations of substance abuse-hard time to think clearly, and with oppositions, the outer manifestation is also a question on whether or not he is decieving or being decieved-and remember he has had this transit for several months (I'm familiar with the Neptune transit for its right on my Aquariusmoon in the third!) Pluto opposition Uranus and on the South Node, with its themes of radical unraveling (sorry for anyone born in the same month). Neptune opposition Pluto (not good for bedrock ideals). Another concept to consider that I took from the Author of the "Next 20 Years". For the head of state, the National Chart supersedes the personal chart. Not even a King born to the purple can outrun the National Destiny. And Saturn (restrictions) is on the National Sun (Head of State) Posted by: Carol on July 31, 2004 05:34 AMPersonal data: 10/13/56, Cincinnati, 10:05 am, (No EDT) (EST). Neptune has been very prominent in my life lately. Posted by: Carol on July 31, 2004 05:36 AMFrom Hassan Jaffer a vedic astrologer at astro databank.com 3/14/ 2004 And on 3/15/2004 Jaffers says; "Kerry is defnetly going to win. I predicted in my book moon majic that Al Gore will loose when he was 12 points ahead. Carol...my daughter has N Venus at 8 Cancer and N Moon at 18 Cancer (the moon is in the 12th)....the Saturn transit has, from what I can see from the outside, caused her to have to deal with restrictions (2 very young children, 1 & 3) and 2 VERY demanding bosses...because under the Venus transit from Saturn, she realized there wasn't enough money on just her husband's salary, she said oh, I'll just start being a virtual assistant. Being very accommodating (with a Leo Sun conjuncting her Leo rising), she has gotten trampled by her ASSUMPTION that everything would be EASY, working as a virtual assistant for 2 people who are always juggling 18 balls in the air and saying...I've got two of them, you catch the rest. Her ASSUMPTIONS have made her reasses her state of mind - and her grumpy attitude shows. She realizes she undervalued herself and her skills and that she really missed the boat about almost everything else....it was all very very difficult for her to deal with. However, she also saw it, said it, and admitted it. On her own....something GWB probably is incapable of doing. Posted by: judi on July 31, 2004 06:06 AMWhoooohooooo! Air America spreads wings The liberal talk network Air America, heard locally on WLIB (1190 AM), is adding Mike Malloy, 10 p.m.-1 a.m. weeknights, starting Aug. 2. Sinton says he thinks the flurry of stories about instability at the fledgling network "are pretty much behind us now. ... We're focused on making this work, and it's happening." Simultaneously, he says, "Our product is improving. I'd be the first to admit some of what we did the first month was bad. But now we sound pretty good." Timing is everything Chas. The planets don't care they just keep going around the earth dropping storms or sunshine on everyone, rich and poor, young and old, men and women etc, etc, etc. The timing is perfect for Kerry and for that matter Edwards. Saturn will make an opposition to the US Pluto in October, then retrograde and making another opposition in Dec. and then another after the 1st of the year. This is our money, (US Money) if there is a crash after the 1st of the year the new President will take the blame. If their is a crash in October, this President will take the blame. Kerry was born on a Full Moon and in Vedic astrology that is an incredible aspect, particularly with the Sun in the 1st (in Vedic astrology that is a destiny placement) Pluto passed his Sun for the last time last year about the time he began rising as the candidate, Pluto over the sun gives you the opportunity to come into your own power. The one thing that disturbs me in his chart is his progressed Mars (which was retrograde at birth) has now progressed back to his natal Mars and is within minutes of being exact. Interesting that Joe is a no. 3/Gemini as he is quite an effective communicator and has certainly gotten our attention. From where I stand, George Bush is not all bad - no one is. I am sure we can come up with some good he has done for the nation. However, for some very good reasons, he is extremely unpopular, not only among Democrats and liberals, but also among Republicans, Europeans, Canadians, and many others worldwide. Dislike and distrust like that has to be earned. It does not happen randomly nor overnight. In fact, many of us gave our government the benefit of the doubt for a very long while. I remember feeling extremely uncomfortable with the decision to invade Iraq. It seemed to drop out of the sky. There are other countries in the Mideast who are much better equipped to do damage (Iran, Syria). So, to avoid cognitive disonance, I decided that our government had to have a damn good reason. So much for that! Whether on his own or due to the influence of his mentors/handlers, GWB has: 1) gotten us into a very expensive, very sticky, and very unnecessary and tragic, pre-emptive war; 2) managed to get us into enormous debt for what reason? - political expediency. Money has been spent to buy the support of countries such as Pakistan as well as wealthy corporations, such as those in the pharmaceutical industry, so that they would keep him in office. The latter has resulted in a Rx drug plan that has seniors thoroughly confused and one that the "experts" don't even understand 3) Alienated teachers and school boards with the "No Child Left Behind" plan 4) Sacrificed critical environmental protections and has not responded to the urgent need to become independent of oil so that we will not have to go to war for oil nor will we contribute to global warning (we may not be able to control volcanos but we can surely control our own actions) 5) Not created nearly enough jobs to balance those laid off and outsourced; and many of those created are lower level jobs. Yes, it is not for lack of good reasons that this man and his administration are unformly disliked. And were it not for the support of basically 2-issue, good, religious Christians and others who are duped by the packaging and see him as a "good ole boy" or a "strong leader," he would not have much support left at all. Yes, he comes across as decisive and persistent, but what good are those qualities if they are ultimately dangerous and destructive?
Namaste, 10-4 shylurker; that's a positive. let me know when i can leave time-out (lol). Posted by: mike on July 31, 2004 07:42 AMHi Sally and All, Read some of the speeches from the democractic convention and they are really uplifting, gives one hope for the future of the world, new energy, new, intelligent and compassionate leadership coming out of the US is what we all look forward to. John Kerry made some challenging statements regarding oil and the Saudi royal family which I don't think were made or taken lightly. I hope he doesn't meet with "misfortune", before or after the elections. Obama is another with amazing energy, I wonder if his moon is at 22/23 taurus conjunct the great conjunction of 2000, making him someone to watch for the next 16 years in US politics. Need I say it's wonderful that he is half Kenyan. What a wonderful change. much love, The BIG BLUE maps of the USA, with Kerry Edwards, or Michaud ( our Rep to the house) Azara, The time they are a-changing, indeed. And that is what is bothering these white males so much... it's more than the desire for empire and oil, imho. Remember months ago when we discussed esoteric astrology and Pluto's movement through Sag? I can't recall the author's name... Sharon, Beverly ... do you remember...? wonderful couple of articles about the return after thousands of years to the feminine... to the goddess motif... As a white southern female I have been watching the angst of the white male since the pill was discovered and they began doing battle with the 'liberal fems'... they are desperately clinging to their eroding power... unwilling to share. They've lost control... people of color are mayors in some major cities and knocking hard at the doors of governors' mansions and the white house... The tide has turned. [I intend no male-bashing... we have been pre-occupied with the male aspect of ourselves for much too long... time for balance, says the universe... hang on, Snoopy, the ride will be rough!] Sharon, are you still on vacation, or back? Good to hear your calming voice... Morgana music is coming... full BLUE moon is coming... peace and light surround... Namaste Posted by: Jo on July 31, 2004 01:25 PM
Just read you post above, and then went to http://www.guardian.co.uk/print/0,3858,4982979-110881,00.html Evidently he hasn't got the message. Posted by: wv on July 31, 2004 01:57 PM
http://www.guardian.co.uk/print/0,3858,4983089-103682,00.html Posted by: wv on July 31, 2004 02:25 PMWV, Happy full BLUE moon WV... some times we picked to live in, right? Namaste Posted by: Jo on July 31, 2004 02:32 PMWell, here comes the Piscean effect, and it will be here for quite a while. Posted by: Pat C on July 31, 2004 02:33 PMhttp://www.prospect.org/weblog/archives/2004/07/index.html#003374 WAS BERGER SMEARED? Sure looks like it. The Wall Street Journal reports: Officials looking into the removal of classified documents from the National Archives by former Clinton National Security Adviser Samuel Berger say no original materials are missing and nothing Mr. Berger reviewed was withheld from the commission investigating the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks. Several prominent Republicans, including House Speaker Dennis Hastert and House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, have voiced suspicion that when Mr. Berger was preparing materials for the 9/11 Commission on the Clinton administration's antiterror actions, he may have removed documents that were potentially damaging to the former president's record. The conclusion by archives officials and others would seem to lay to rest the issue of whether any information was permanently destroyed or withheld from the commission. Archives spokeswoman Susan Cooper said officials there "are confident that there aren't any original documents missing in relation to this case." She said in most cases, Mr. Berger was given photocopies to review, and that in any event officials have accounted for all originals to which he had access. More.... Posted by: Pat C on July 31, 2004 02:54 PMI want to play too. Inspired by the Pope's hypocrisy. Flip: Pro Life for the unborn fetus (how come there's always a majority of men in the pro-life marches??????) Flip: Love, Peace, God, It's All Good The day when men grow a uterus is the day they can have an opinion over a woman's body . Otherwise, 'shove it'.
Azara, how wonderful to hear from you. I wonder how everything is for you everyday. Yes, Mr. Barak Obama is creating quite a stir in the US, he seems to be the most exciting young star in politics. Wish I had his birthtime but the earliest degree of his moon could be (if born at midnight) 23 Taurus and the latest (at 11:59pm) would be 5 Gemini. Mr. Obama made a huge hit at the convention, this guy can be taken seriously as a candidate for President in 2012 or even 2008. He suffers however from John Edwards problem, his youthful appearance. He is an outstanding writer an excellent communicator and seems to have the unusual gift of honesty. (I've been watching his reputation rise in Illinois for the last 9/10 months.) His wife is also intelligent (a working attorney) and she is graceful and beautiful. Several months ago I read a little back page article of Mr. Obama and how he had gone to court to have a "stalking" photographer stopped. His opponent, Mr. Ryan, was doing this, the judge issued a restraining order. I was so impressed with how Obama just stood up to the bullies that I started following his career. At least we have let the possibility escape our lips that there might be an African/American President or even (horrors of horrors) a woman president. So now the possibility is out there and where there is possibility there is probability. Did you hear his speech? I heard a speech writer say the it was the best speech he ever heard, nothing trite or hackneyed, no cliches, and he was going to win Illinois Senate Race before Ryan dropped out. They can't even get anyone to run against him. I think he will get lost in the Congressional shuffle after he goes to Washington, but give him a little time and he will rise to the top, he's just too good and he is a Leo, he will go for the "world stage." Willie Brown (former popular mayor of San Francisco) said he is the new voice of America and I believe that to be true. Lovely to hear from you and take care. Posted by: Sally on July 31, 2004 03:01 PMHa, Bhakti, I love it. Our new cry "shove it." This is the most frightened I've seen the European White Male in over 30 years. Not since the feminist movement in the 60's. I have been expecting a huge push again to get women back "in their place." I don't think it will work. Look at the women they fear, all strong, all popular. I feel that the dam is about to break, they must be terrified. Part of the "new world" coming. Posted by: Sally on July 31, 2004 03:11 PM
http://www.local10.com/news/3598475/detail.html Posted by: wv on July 31, 2004 03:17 PM
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3922579.stm Posted by: wv on July 31, 2004 03:27 PMYippie Sally, hope I'm a part of eroding that damn dam ;) I also sent a whistleblower letter in my profession for a contest where out of 40 semi-finalists 2 women were chosen. Oh and of course out of the 5 winners was the one token woman which is how it usually is. Said I'd use my contacts (over 2000) to out the prejudice of this and not to use his product. The guy wrote back and admitted he did not catch the lopsided ratio. Yeah, right. Money talks, doesn't it? Bhakti, you rock. This is great and if we all did this think what we could accomplish. This is great. Posted by: Sally on July 31, 2004 03:55 PM http://www.yellowtimes.org/print.php?sid=2021 Posted by: wv on July 31, 2004 04:12 PMCBS, MSNBC and CNN--on the internet (thanks, Al)--have the campaigns as their featured story so far today. Each of them has one picture that goes with the story and it is of Smirky. Interesting that Snarly seems to have disappeared. Posted by: shylurker on July 31, 2004 04:47 PMI agree, Mr. Barak Obama will be a force to be reckon with. I read this over at dailykos: One of the media conversations I'm peripherally aware of … is the "why do people call Obama black?" It's quite fascinating, really, that this is an issue. Is it me or do they just keep digging a bigger hole? Posted by: abilene on July 31, 2004 05:24 PM http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/pp/04212/354164.stm Posted by: wv on July 31, 2004 05:27 PMSally, I remember the incident about the photographer you mention in reference to Obama. As I recall, his political opponent hired a person to, essentially, follow Barak every minute of his day and just annoy the living hell out of him. Nice tactic, Republican party, by the way. I believe the judge initially hesitated to intervene but Barak made it clear that it was unacceptable and would not be tolerated and his opponent backed off. Another insight into Obama's strong character and perhaps a refreshing one in these modern times!
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/printer_080104Z.shtml Posted by: wv on July 31, 2004 05:49 PMObamarama -Atrios 12:28 PM Obama is a breath of fresh air! I really wish some network would replay the whole thing. More americans need to hear these words. Posted by: abilene on July 31, 2004 05:51 PMSheesh. Smirky & Snarly. Biggest budget. Biggest deficit. Biggest job loss (well, not counting the Great Depression). And let's hear it, gang: Biggest loss ever at the polls on November 2nd. Posted by: shylurker on July 31, 2004 05:56 PMPosted on dailykos: Just saw this on MSNBC after Bush stopped talking, take it for what it's worth.... THURSDAY SAMPLE FRIDAY SAMPLE Also, tied on handling of Iraq. Just think, if Kerry does get a 15% bounce out the convention, it will be the first time bush has predicted anything correctly! Posted by: abilene on July 31, 2004 06:05 PMSally, Do you perhaps know what Article it was posted here that outlined Nader's astrology and when he may be pulling out? I just noticed some news out of PA that says he abruptly abandoned the City Center office he had been using (leaving behind a mess and the room in tatters) after being besieged the night before by dozens of homeless people demanding the money they were promised for gathering signatures! If this news doesn't hurt his chances, I don't know what would!!! I think someone, one of our fine astrologers, indicated he may pull out by August or early September. Do you remember what article it is so I can look it up myself? Thanks. Jonathan Posted by: Jonathan on July 31, 2004 06:35 PMJonathan, I don't know which article, I addressed him and so did Nancy, I do remember we both did so reluctantly because we both felt he was a non issue. I write a ton of articles for this site and a couple of small mags in Europe, so there would be too many for me to go back and sort them out. I will try later tonight. Posted by: Sally on July 31, 2004 06:52 PMI was thinking that this past week showed the RNC that Gore and Clinton made peace, black leadership is becoming mainstream, women can say anything they want especially in defending themselves. Sharpton could care less about speech boundaries of 6 minutes and went 20 minutes telling the world how blacks have been really treated in our history in order to defended the Dems. RNC learned how everyone is joining forces right now because we are aware and using that awareness to get this Shrub out of 1600. RNC must be really sweating. BTW, since Crawford is a poser home for photo ops, and he can't go back to the Gov mansion, where is GW's real home? Does he move back in with his parents?;) Posted by: bhakti on July 31, 2004 06:52 PMLast night Bill Mahler (don't know if thats the correct spelling) had Michael Moore and Ralph Nader on his show. Bill and Michael got down on their knees and begged Nader not to run. I don't think that has anything to do with Jonathan's post. It's just so sad to me how many good people bush has tainted. Dennis Miller, Colin Powell, John McCain and Ralph Nader. Some days I just ask myself, what does bush have on these people? How did Ralph ever let the republicans get to him? How did they get him to buy in to it? Posted by: abilene on July 31, 2004 06:56 PMDo believe the VOC Blue Moon 'virus' has disappeared with the direct Moon. Peace at last. Posted by: on July 31, 2004 06:56 PM
http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/printer_4935.shtml Posted by: wv on July 31, 2004 07:06 PMI just realized it's Lammas! Sally, I know you do a great deal of writing and there are many, many things to sift through. Please don't worry about using your time to find the exact article. If someone should think of it, that's cool. If not, I'm sure I'll survive. That PA story, though, made me think of what you et al. had said and I wanted to double-check the timing. That's all. :-) Jonathan Posted by: Jonathan on July 31, 2004 07:32 PMOkay all you history buffs... does ANYONE remember another time (apart from Nancy and son Ronnie) when the family of an ex-president opposed the party's sitting president? Publicly or privately for that matter? Thought so. Why haven't we heard anything from the press? This is news, right?! That's a rhetorical question of course. Okay - here's an idea for the universe to spread and someone to pick up on - a funeral for the extinct, non-existing journalists in the 'news' [not infotainment] industry... The USA no longer has a 'press' corps... no longer can we depend on the networks or cable to report the news. So, why not a funeral... we need closure, folks! Welcome to the new messengers... independent reporters working for foreign news agencies and the tireless researchers on the blogs... off with the filters! ---------- Well, seems to me the 'big' papers have taken on the habits of the little paper... there's no real 'news' --- just press releases from the White House or Talking Points from the RNC... and folks repay in kind --- not with chickens or greens now, but something a little more expensive... a couple of weeks at a fancy resort for the family, education for the children, new vehicle to chase those ambulances, etc. Anybody else think it's time for a change? Posted by: Jo on July 31, 2004 07:50 PMJonathan, try this. http://www.astroworld.us/archives/000375.html#000375 Posted by: Teresa on July 31, 2004 07:50 PMGood article about Kerry by Adrian Duncan http://www.world-of-wisdom.com/04_articles/2004/04_kerry_pr.htm -snip-- Kerry's chances The key to Kerry’s success or failure in the November 2nd election may lie in the subtle influence of progressions, and they are looking good. Take a minor factor like the proximity of Kerry’s Sun to his Ascendant. It is curious to see that as his progressed Ascendant increases in speed through the signs of short ascension like Aquarius, it catches up with the progressed Sun, and will actually conjoin it during the next presidential period. Plenty of opportunity to look at mirrors then! More powerfully this Ascendant and Sun conjunction at 20 Aquarius is just two degrees from opposing progressed Jupiter at 22 degrees Leo, and this will become exact during the next presidential period. In fact the Descendant progressed will conjoin radix Jupiter at the 2008 election, which could even indicate a two-term president. As mentioned before, Kerry’s progressed Mars returns in 2005 to its natal position after a 62-year apprenticeship. A rare Mars return of this nature suggests a radical change and completely new territory. As 4th house ruler, a move to the White House might be appropriate, especially as Mars conjoins the Moon. Furthermore Kerry’s progressed MC is at 7.01 Sagittarius at the election. There is no reason to think that his birth time is inaccurate either... during the course of 2003 the IC has been exactly on his Uranus, surely reflecting the mad campaigning rush around America. His MC now trines his Leo/Aquarius nodal axis, as it also does the US nodal axis at the same position. This indicates a fated moment of greatness, in which the projections of the masses are fulfilled in the person of Kerry. From 2005 to 2006 his MC trines Pluto, so if there was ever a time when Kerry would be handling power, it is in the coming years. Posted by: Laurie on July 31, 2004 07:54 PMJonathan check out Nancy's archives for April 5th. I think this may be what you were remembering: " But by mid-August 2004, Neptune, the Deceiver, will have effectively weakened its grasp on Nader’s distorted perceptions just as some much-needed Saturnian practicality enters the picture. From mid-August through mid-September, Saturn will in rapid succession square Jupiter, oppose Pluto, sesquiquadrate the Sun, and square Uranus. There is a strong possibility that these four weeks will see a bracing splash of cold water thrown over Nader’s pretensions. It may be that during this period or shortly thereafter, he will drop out of the race and accept the reality of his potentially disastrous impact on the presidential race. There is, of course, no guarantee that this will occur, but it is safe to say that the hugely inflated ego energy and the self-delusion that are very much impacting Nader’s current awareness will be far weaker from mid-August through November 2004. And we can hope that he may take the painful step that liberates his tiny band of supporters from making another historical blunder of massive proportion." Nancy Waterman on Apr 5 | Link Posted by: Shade on July 31, 2004 07:55 PMNow is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country. Posted by: Pat C on July 31, 2004 08:07 PMthanks for the "snippet" from the earlier article. I knew there was something that had been written that dealt with Nader. If he keeps leaving his campaign offices in the shape he left the one in PA, he'll lose lots of friends fast. Jonathan Posted by: Jonathan on July 31, 2004 08:15 PMJo, Riane Eisler wrote a very good academic book called "The Chalice and the Blade," (not be confused with a fiction book of the same name). She explains how the peaceful, partnership-oriented, Goddess-worshipping people of Europe were usurped by marauding, iron weapon-using oppressors from the northern plans and southern steppes. The best example of one of these VERY evolved societies was the Minoans who lived on Crete. They made beautiful art and had advanced culture and technology. The intrusion of iron weapons and a warlike mentality changed the balance for all time to one of dominator/dominated, only to be shifted temporarily back towards balance during the times of Early Christianity, the Renaisance, and our own. When the book was written, 20 years ago, she felt we were on the brink of either shifting back or disaster. I "know" that we ARE shifting back to a balanced, peaceful world that will respect and honor ALL life, and ALL will be allowed and encouraged to realize their potential. Did anyone ever read "Summerhill"? It's the account of a school in England where the most rebellous kids were sent, and where they were never forced to learn anything but were allowed to choose from among a very varied curricula (or do nothing). They eventually chose and follow-up showed they were very happy adults. Yes, I am still on my 2-week vacation in the mts of New Mexico and Colorado. We began in Albuquerque and Santa Fe, staying in the vacation home of a friend, then went on to my brother-in-law's condo in Keystone (next to Breckenridge) and then visited him in Boulder. I white-water rafted 17 miles (not bad for a 53 year old; I was very nervous but it wasn't so difficult as the river keeps ya moving) and took a 6- mile hike down a mountain. Since I grew up in the north, I'm used to woods and mountains but nothing surpasses the beauty of the Rockies. I also visited the Georgia O'Keefe museum and the D.H. Lawrence ranch, two artists whom I revere. I am very blessed to have a husband who made all this possible. When I return next week, I'll begin practicing real estate and registering voters in the Democratic districts of New Orleans. Hope to pour a lot of energy into the latter. Thanks for asking, Jo. By the way, did you know that Barak means "blessing" in Hebrew? Except it is said with a final, Germanic "ch" sound, as in "Barach." Every prayer begins "Barach ata Adonoi" or "Blessed are you, G-d." Just goes to show you how much connection exists among peoples. Namaste,
Polls show shrub is falling off the cliff, irrespective of nader in the race or not.Nader will not help, as the cons/repugs think, shrub's Sharon, We ARE all connected... isn't it amazing how the psyche picks up cues and uses terms for things that express the 'reality' --- i.e., the internet, the 'web' --- 'threads' on blogs... etc. As the native Americans, especially the Pueblo and Anasazi remind us in their story telling of Spider Woman and her web... Thank you for posting and triggering my memories of a place that still evokes magic and mystery. Namaste Posted by: Jo on July 31, 2004 08:54 PMIt is Lammas! Yes, Lammas is another one of ye goode This festival also celebrates the more ancient theme of Our own energies begin to gear down now, too, ready http://www.azstarnet.com/dailystar/dailystar/32301.php Bush camp solicits race of Star staffer ARIZONA DAILY STAR President Bush's re-election campaign insisted on knowing the race of an Arizona Daily Star journalist assigned to photograph Vice President Dick Cheney. More.... Posted by: Pat C on July 31, 2004 09:49 PMhttp://www.startribune.com/stories/484/4904237.html Dayton: FAA, NORAD hid 9/11 failures WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Sen. Mark Dayton, D-Minn., charged Friday that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) have covered up "catastrophic failures" that left the nation vulnerable during the Sept. 11 hijackings.
More... Posted by: Pat C on July 31, 2004 09:55 PMOh my gosh Sharon, that sounds so wonderful! Enjoy! Posted by: Pat C on July 31, 2004 09:58 PMhttp://www.lewrockwell.com/kwiatkowski/kwiatkowski87.html Why Sudan? Posted by: Pat C on July 31, 2004 10:06 PMBuild a Better Bush Dear WV, I have to say that the Ralph Ellis editorial in Yellowtimes was very biased against Israel. He is right in that the Palestinian/Israeli conflict is one of the most crucial of our times, however, he should think asbout the old Indian saying that you don't know a man until you have walked a mile in his shoes. I hesitate to provoke any of the old arguments we have gotten into here (besides, Pallas18 is not around; I wonder where she is?), but I am somewhat surprised that you could support something so biased. As far as the security wall goes, Israel is without suicide bombings for the first time in a long while, and Netanyahu has said that the wall can and will be moved as soon as the Palestinians show they are serious about peace. The recent chaos in the Palestinian Authority as well as the desire of the PM to quit, just as the previous one did, shows that it is not Israel who has emasculated the Palestinians -- it is Arat & Hamas who have betrayed them with their violence and misuse of funds. Other than that, Happy Blue Moon and Happy Lamas, Everyone. Thank you for the explanation, Dommael, as I was wondering about its meaning. Sharon Posted by: on July 31, 2004 10:21 PMPallas is working very hard over at DU on an important thread concerning the Plame outing. It is now thread #14 It's as big as a book now. http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x2123068 Posted by: Laurie on July 31, 2004 10:46 PMSharon, The WORLD has condemned the 'WALL'... Why is it okay to criticize the actions of the American government, and not the actions of Israel's government. I do not have to walk a mile in anybody's shoes before being critical of their actions. Neither does anyone else. WV is free to post any link... is it bias to criticize Israel? Then, SO BE IT. What do you mean you are hesitant to "to provoke any of the old arguments we have gotten into here (besides, Pallas18 is not around; I wonder where she is?), but I am somewhat surprised that you could support something so biased." Black people get criticized... Fundies get criticized... White males get criticized... Southerns get barbequed... Catholics get criticized... Holy cow, the Pope gets skewered. But one cannot criticize Israel? On what planet? And fyi Pallas 18 is at Democratic Underground, or at least she was recently... do you need backup to criticize WV, who is probably ten years this grandmother's senior...? I'm pretty tired of this... I don't think John Kerry ever promised homeless people money to gather signatures and then skipped town without paying them. How can actions such as this make ANYONE a better person than anyone else? Jonathan Posted by: Jonathan on July 31, 2004 11:10 PMJo, It is fine to criticize anything anyone wants to, including Israel. My comment had to do with the fact that the article posted was extremely biased, with no attempt at objectivity whatsoever. Sharon Posted by: on July 31, 2004 11:15 PMI wasn't aware we were talking about Al Gore. Weren't we talking about Ralph Nader and him being "better"? And, if one is to paint others with the deeds of those they know, couldn't we paint Bush with the brush of that little weasel Ken Lay? :-) Jonathan Posted by: Jonathan on July 31, 2004 11:28 PMRalph Nader man than John Kerry? That has to be one of the most inane statements I've ever read. Somehow I seriously doubt you'd be saying that if Nader were taking votes away from Bush. BTW, a candidate getting 3 percent in national polls (which is significantly more than he'll get on election day) has nothing to teach Kerry, believe me. Posted by: Paula on July 31, 2004 11:29 PM::ducks left, fakes right:: Joe is stuck in the neocon black hole and is just here to BAIT. His old acorns aren't worth the band width. Posted by: Pat C on July 31, 2004 11:39 PMKos has a poll from Newsweek as of 7/29-30: Gist is Kerry/Edwards, 49% Here's the link for inside info on the poll as well as more poll info... http://www.dailykos.com/story/2004/7/31/11579/3709 BLUE, BLUE, BLUE everywhere... Does anyone doubt the moon is full? Posted by: Jo on July 31, 2004 11:41 PMThank you Jo for the link! Posted by: Pat C on July 31, 2004 11:44 PMPat C, I know. And I showed a bit of weakness in playing his game, so I won't anymore. Caught Barak Obama's speech from the Dem Convention on C-Span and, as is usually not the case, this one held up even after a second viewing! Just an amazing, heart-felt, beautifully written and delivered and sincere speech. And then caught Teresa's speech and was touched, again, by her sincerity and almost endearing shyness at times. :-) She'll make a wonderful First Lady. And it looks as if Western Pennsylvania is trending toward Kerry and the Democrats after voting solidly Republican the last several cycles BECAUSE of her amazing philanthropy in Pittsburgh. Considering writing the Kerry campaign and asking them to respond to Bush's attacks on Kerry's Senate service by comparing that to what Bush was doing during those years. Arbusto Energy anybody? Jonathan Posted by: Jonathan on July 31, 2004 11:45 PMHey everybody, Jonathan, that's a wonderful idea. I hope you do write. Here is another interesting poll to cheer you. www.pollingreport.com Posted by: Pat C on July 31, 2004 11:47 PMIf only people would focus on the issues, the voting records and the outcomes with maturity and common sense rather than this petty, pathetic, infantile party rivalry bullshit that makes people blindly vote for whatever shit-du-jour the talking heads are spouting - damn, we'd have a country! We need to break through this dug-in-heels, them-versus-us mentality or we will get NOWHERE. Peace makes sense. A strong defense when needed makes sense. Protecting the environment we DEPEND ON to BREATHE makes sense. Making the education of our children more of a priority than sending spaceships to Mars makes sense. WHERE is the freaking common sense? Gawd, I'm sick of this. Sheesh! This tit-for-tat shit has GOT TO STOP. Posted by: Tired on July 31, 2004 11:56 PMbhakti, THANK YOU for putting a name to this tactic so prevalent in my conversations with certain family members. Yes, yes! A denial tactic for sure, so appropraite enough the Queen of Denial, my mom. I ask her to define what she thinks Bush has done that is so wonderful for the country, and BINGO! we're talking somehow about Clinton. By the way, did everyone hear that a butterfly farted in East Pathetic, Texas and IT'S ALL CLINTON's FAULT!! Posted by: Lucy on August 1, 2004 12:02 AMPat C, Just posted my thoughts on the Kerry blog. Let's see what the response over there will be! :-) Jonathan Posted by: Jonathan on August 1, 2004 12:06 AMDo read this. http://www.lostremote.com/archives/001905.html Posted by: Pat C on August 1, 2004 12:07 AMLucy, I JUST SAW CNN report on that butterfly farting in East Pathetic and they agree that, yes, it IS Clinton's fault. But Bush is on the way and will save everyone, so just hold tight. LOL Hang in there. Help Is On The Way ... and, no, it ain't Bush. Jonathan Posted by: Jonathan on August 1, 2004 12:08 AMWonderful Jonathan! I know you are being heard. Posted by: Pat C on August 1, 2004 12:08 AMPat C, Aw ... you're makin' me blush. :-) Jonathan Posted by: Jonathan on August 1, 2004 12:11 AMOh Jonathan, I love a good blush!! :-D Posted by: Pat C on August 1, 2004 12:17 AMJonathan, do you think we should send out a special ops unit to KILL THAT BUTTERFLY before he TALKS!? Posted by: Lucy on August 1, 2004 12:18 AMThe Astrophiles already have a triangulation going at this forum. The objective seems to be to strike a balance between common~sense, book~learning and the ultra~intensive subtle nuances of astrology and the movements of the heavenly spheres. Gaining access to all three volumes in your mind is preferable, some folks can't even get one bulb burning steadily, but hey, I'm sure I'm just the lone voice in the wilderness on this. Though tolerant to sometimes baffling levels, I'd say there is a consensus among us that the heart of wit is brevity and if you don't have anything constructive to say, say nothing. Lucy, Lucy, You can breathe easy now. I've just heard Cheney is going to go all "ninja" on that butterfly and, once again, Save the World. Thank goodness they're in Office, you know? Jonathan Posted by: Jonathan on August 1, 2004 12:28 AMbhakti, Well, there's nothing left to do but start a TIPS line to report suspicious butterflies. And we'll have to hire Halliburton to build new butterfly detention centers to keep our great nation free, because those butterflies hate our freedom, you see, and if we don't git 'em, they'll fart all over us. Posted by: Lucy on August 1, 2004 12:34 AMJo, the butterflies come in all shapes and colors, but they all look alike, see, and if they ain't with us, they're aign' us, so we gotta kill 'em all! I say, I say, kill 'em all! Kill the butterflies! Kill the butterflies! Oh, Gawd, I'm punchy from all this. Posted by: Lucy on August 1, 2004 12:40 AMLucy, perhaps you might want to lie down, hon. this Butterfly incident has been a bit too much for ya, I think. :-) Jonathan P.S. There's a wonderful man named Robert, from TX, I believe, who was a strong supporter of Bush, but is asking those on the John Kerry web site to help educate him as to why he should vote for Kerry. He obviously likes Bush, but is torn because Bush seems to have broken so many promises and with the war and all ... besides he's got two young daughters and he worries about their future. He seems like a great, educated guy, and one who is evidently trending toward Kerry. Nice conversation with someone who has different viewpoints but doesn't have the baiting, the anger, the I'm right- you're wrong attitude. Just a wonderful conversation! Posted by: Jonathan on August 1, 2004 12:53 AMJonathan, refreshing, the absence of that broken record, isn't it? One can almost smell the fear. Posted by: Lucy on August 1, 2004 01:02 AMThat broken record actually smells like success to me! Or is that just Flop Sweat? Posted by: Jonathan on August 1, 2004 01:04 AMRubaiat and all, The condescending laugh is the action to keep you down, to set up the power heirarchy. Let them feel their feelings of low self worth to have even projected that action onto you. Don't react. That honors your boundaries as well as theirs coz then you two don't fight. Keep on the issues. Why feel bad about yourself when you are thinking and being like a scientist or detective to see all angles of an issue. Keep seeing 360o. I am not impressed with Dittoheads. Posted by: bhakti on August 1, 2004 01:06 AM What broken record? The one of John Kerry singing along with Outkast in Bombs over Baghdad? Posted by: on August 1, 2004 01:06 AMSharon There will NEVER be Peace in the world until the And thank God we live in a country where OutKast can make their music and a John Kerry can sing along if he wants to. At least we're not being forced ---yet--- to sing along with Ashcroft when he warbles out his "Let the Eagel Soar"!!!!!!!! Posted by: Jonathan on August 1, 2004 01:10 AMJonathan, I have now recovered from the butterfly incident long enough to say that the smell of fear is eminating from the broken record. Can't you smell it? Over and out. Going to celebrate the Blue Moon over our Blue Nation. : ) Posted by: Lucy on August 1, 2004 01:13 AMshylurker, i'm waiting. Posted by: mike on August 1, 2004 01:28 AMMike, what are you waiting for? Apparently, we're under red alert because of butterflies. Get busy, man, save us! Posted by: shylurker on August 1, 2004 01:46 AMFrom LO, Michael Moore's barn-burning speech from the Take Back America conference: On The Rise Of The Unlikely Voter They are the people who have been the most hurt by the Bush Administration. They're people of color. They're single moms. They're poor. They're working class. The young people… …And they are now talking politics. And they are not apathetic. And I think we're going to see a significant number of them leave the house on November 2. How quickly they forget about Jesse "the body" Ventura??? I was there. It took forever to vote that night. I think Kerry is going to win big!! Posted by: abilene on August 1, 2004 01:54 AMPS to Mike. Don't forget your war-cry as you charge those terra-ist butterflies: In-A-Gadda-Da-Vida!! Posted by: shylurker on August 1, 2004 02:02 AMI for one want to take this moment to thank George Walker Bush for uniting Americans by the lessons learned from his lack of heart, his simple single mindedness, and his sophmoric alienating attitude. I want to thank George for the the lesson of coming into our real power. He's been a real catalyst. Thanks! So George, your job is done, Karma over. We the People got the lesson and became united, and we the People are now going to boot your butt out of power. We pay you. And you stink at your profession. GW, you're fired. Berger Cleared of Withholding 9/11 Material PPS to Mike: Eeeeeeeeek! It appears the butterfly brigades are being joined by the dragonflies. Posted by: shylurker on August 1, 2004 02:31 AMshylurker, free at last! hey, i saw those guys, iron butterfly, sing just that song (and i remember it). better living through chemistry! i'll tell you one guy who doesn't get butterflies, kerry. i have a nice x-section of friends from lefties/artist types to disinterested geeks/professionals. everybody that saw the speech was wowed (as in the 60's root term wow). one of my best friends, a former reflexive corporate republican said just today, it's not even going to be close; kerry rocks. i'm off to see the manchurian candidate...more later Posted by: mike on August 1, 2004 02:40 AMFar out, man! Posted by: shylurker on August 1, 2004 02:43 AMI'm just shocked, shocked I tell ya. Y'know, I think there's probably one primary reason Astroworld is attracting dittoheads (and it's probably going to get worse.) After the DNC (I simply do not have the energy to scroll up and find who said it) but it's been a week of women and minorities speaking their minds and displays of unheard~of unity within the Democratic Party. Some folks may be having cognitive dissonance that this website has a much larger influence over the inner machinations of the Democratic party that it actually does are freaking simply because they perceive that the Dems have soldered the cracks together well enough to remove *ush soundly from office. Little do they know that most everyone here has disagreed with everyone else on one or another points but there is an overwhelming mutual respect that lets us focus on larger issues. That mutual respect didn't appear overnight, either, it came from hashing and re~hashing points of view and referring to the primary focus, which is astrology. Yes, the wheels are coming off the wagons of the GOP and if you just happened to stumble across the site you'd probably freak at your perception of our solidarity. That broken record is, and make no mistake, *fear* that you are hearing. Probably the first real, true fear at the changing of the paradigm that we've heard in a few years. Boah howdy you better believe that is only the tip of the iceberg, too. If we're hearing it here the wings of those butterflies must be fanning the flames like mad elsewhere. I am distressed by this article about the GOP tactics. It is so negative--and, if they were women--would be criticized as being catty! They are really into the politics of personal destruction. I really hope this backfires: Bush Planning August Attack Against Kerry WASHINGTON, July 31 — ...Mr. Bush's advisers plan to cap the month at the Republican convention in New York, which they said would feature Mr. Kerry as an object of humor and calculated derision.... http://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/01/politics/campaign/01CAMP.html Posted by: bethcf4p on August 1, 2004 03:32 AMJoe, In my humble opinion, you are transparent in your misrepresentations of yourself and positions. You said you're well versed in many subjects, including astrology, but somehow can't find out basic birth chart information. When pointed to Bush's chart, you say you want to do it yourself. Like you never heard of google. And since that time no deep analysis of Bush's chart. (Totally unrelated trivia: I read somewhere his chart was nearly identical to Michael Milkens'. I hope that means he also fades away from the publics' eye as Milken did). http://www.galacticcenter.org/bush.htm Joe, you say you really like Nader, but clearly just want to push him to take votes from Kerry with your "wouldn't it be great if Nader got 10%"? If you were a true Nader supporter you'd want him to do better than W. Oh, I should've just left it alone, as Bhakti wisely suggested... Posted by: beth on August 1, 2004 04:05 AMDFNEC Do not feed the energy creature. Posted by: on August 1, 2004 04:16 AMLoyalty Oaths Josh Marshall discusses the loyalty oaths one has to take in order to attend a Cheney rally. I'm too lazy to hunt it down, but one of my many brilliant blog posts sometime back raised this exact question - how the hell are Bush/Cheney going to campaign seriously given the extreme private nature of all of their events and the extreme security associated with them? I guess we have our answer - they aren't planning to. It's interesting -- I guess their plan is to screw the personal touch and hope that positive local news coverage of their fake campaign rallies brings some more people aboard. Good. It's a huge mistake they're making. Go Karl! I went to a Clinton rally in 1996. One had to go down to the local Dem headquarters to pick up tickets and I believe sign your name, but that was the extent of the barrier to entry. -Atrios 9:00 PM And this is going to be a tight race???? Posted by: abilene on August 1, 2004 04:24 AMJoe, You may post all you like but you'll be talking to yourself. Posted by: Jo on August 1, 2004 04:28 AM We've laughed, we've cried, we've lived, we've died and it's not going away until we stop feeding it. Abilene, He's just a fraud Jo at least in my humble opinion. Just don't talk to him. It's a waste. Posted by: Pat C on August 1, 2004 04:37 AMIn case anyone hasn't seen it (all one or two of you), just lookit how bad it is. Even the Repugs are telling people to vote absentee ballot in Fl: http://www.buzzflash.com/contributors/04/07/con04321.html Can you imagine the outrage and havoc that would ensue if our ATMs didn't work? Repug cheneying of the people. Over and over and over again. Even to the point of wanting to make sure our votes don't count. Onward people! We got a country to take back. We got honor to take back! We got honesty to take back! And we surely do have a country to take back! Posted by: shylurker on August 1, 2004 05:01 AMHello. This is for the regular contributors to this board. It is clear that "Joe" has been sent here because the information, points of view and astrological findings on this forum are causing someone, or several someones, in the Republican establishment to be uncomfortable, unsure, worried and/or frightened. The exercise of free speech and respect for opinion on this forum and the conclusions as to potential and likelyhood of Mr. Kerry's success in the Fall is not attractive to the Republicans and the accuracy and clarity of the information here is to be corrupted if possible. Joe has been sent to see if, based on his meager and possibly coached knowledge of astrology, he can put a wedge into the commitment here to a clear and open evaulation of the political/astrological condition presently operating in the American polical environment. Congratulations, he's been totally ineffectual and will have to report back that it didn't work. Ann Posted by: Ann on August 1, 2004 05:04 AMIn the future, once Sally condemns these creeps to the void I think we should take our cues from her. It's her website, after all. I rethought my 'don't react' position and I want to modify it. Don't implode people, if not reacting means not being true to your feelings and if it's appropriate, say something direct. Like, what's up with that annoying condescending laugh? Why do you do that? Posted by: bhakti on August 1, 2004 05:22 AM Robert Novak on Capital Gang: Responding to Shield's report of Republican warnings to vote by absentee ballot ... I think there are plans underway by the Democrats to steal this election in Florida ... (laughter by rest of talking heads) ... no I think they are!! I have some facual material that will come out in due course ... I'm speechless!!! Posted by: abilene on August 1, 2004 05:32 AMok, shylurker, bhakti said i could do this: Joe, here are some activities you may also enjoy: -- go to a synagogue and proclaim Christ is risen; or That should keep you busy for a while This, I hope will make you cheer. You can almost feel the possiblities rising if the Dems can pull this off, and all of us need to help them. The America I have always known was one where we disagreed but we didn't hate one another and I sure would like that America back, no matter whether we are a rich or poor nation. I love "the Democrats didn't move to the center, they are trying to get the center to move to them." http://www.workingforchange.com/article.cfm?itemid=17389 Posted by: Sally on August 1, 2004 06:56 AMBUSH CAMP SOLICITS RACE OF STAR By C.J.Karamargin President Bush's re-election campaign insisted on knowing the race of an Arizona Daily Star journalist assigned to photograph Vice President Dick Cheney. "It was such an outrageous request, I was personally insulted," Hayt said later. oops-that was a "staffers" race they were ask'n about BUSH CAMP SOLICITS RACE OF STAR (STAFFER) Posted by: on August 1, 2004 08:03 AM
By Peggy Noonan
Here is my fear: that the American people, liking and respecting President Bush, and knowing he's a straight shooter with guts, will still feel a great temptation to turn to the boring and disingenuous John Kerry. Hey Peg, I'd never thought of your lame excuse as a possible reason for Bush to lose the election: The "People" really like and respect Bush, But he's just too darn :EXCITING"' for them??? http://www.opinionjournal.com/columnists/pnoonan/?id=110005288 Posted by: on August 1, 2004 08:30 AMHaHAAA! Noonan, a classic fascist wing Mind-Mucker! WhaddaHOOT! Posted by: JoannaOregon on August 1, 2004 09:05 AMWill bet that Noonan has outstanding probs with neptune... slides right in with the bushoholic(s). ;O) Posted by: JoannaOregon on August 1, 2004 09:10 AM...and, lemme get this straight, Robert Novak is afraid the Democrats are going to steal Florida?!? Well, it's a good thing we're sending MMoore down there to keep a camera rolling on everybody, isn't it? Sho' is, Dommael... a REAL good thing! ;O) Posted by: JoannaOregon on August 1, 2004 09:48 AM* The John-John Team, by Maya del Mar How will John Kerry & John Edwards work together? To help us understand this pair, I'm going to explore briefly the charts of Kerry/Edwards, & the composite chart, which is a combination of both charts, & describes the relationship itself. ... con't http://www.daykeeperjournal.com/feature.shtml Posted by: JoannaOregon on August 1, 2004 10:19 AMZogby: Among People Who Did Not Vote in 2000 Ck this out....something new developing in the polls... Among People Who Did Not Vote in 2000: Kerry 50% - *ush 25% Shorter John Zogby: Give It Up, geo The results from the latest Zogby Poll The most recent Zogby poll shows deeper trouble for *ush beyond just the horserace. Mr *ush has fallen in key areas while Sen John Kerry has shored up numerous constituencies in his base. The *ush team's attempted outreach to base Dem & swing constituency has shown to be a failure thus far, limiting his potential growth in the electorate. The ugly details- Among Hispanic Voters: Kerry 69% - *ush 19% Among Southern Voters: Kerry 48% - *ush 46% Viewed Favorably in the South: Kerry 55% - *ush 55% Approve of *ush's Job Performance in the South: 4% US Headed in the Right Direction in the South: 43% Among Young Voters (18-29): Kerry 53% - *ush 33% Among Single Voters: Kerry 69% - *ush 19% In the Red States: Kerry 46% - *ush 48% In the Blue States: Kerry 50% - *ush 38% Among People Who Did Not Vote in 2000: Kerry 50% - *ush 25% -Holden 6:17 PM http://atrios.blogspot.com/ Spicy Heinz adds a dash of unease................. "She is so different, so unique that you don't know what to expect. She's an asset with partisan Democrats, a liability for core Republicans — and it's undetermined with swing voters." Most men stayed mum in the focus group, suggesting Heinz Kerry makes them uneasy but they don't want to get into a fight about her. Luntz found the same male attitude toward Hillary Rodham Clinton early on. Most political strategists doubt that wives have a major impact on the election, but Mrs. Kerry sure doesn't look like an asset compared to the super-popular Laura Bush, a former school librarian. Our Democratic march in the parade yesterday was a smashing success! Got lots of thumbs up on the BLUE MAPS Our Jr. Congressman. Mike Michaud, running for re-election is a lovely man, more handsome than the TV depicts, but MUCH more important........ a very honest direct, warm human being! He walked in the parade behind Harold's truck, with the rest of us, and I directed him up onto the porch, to say hello to our most "infirm'. & most faithful Democrat. Her caregiver, brings her to the Town hall to vote without fail. Pat QOP... good for you!! Great work imo! Posted by: JoannaOregon on August 1, 2004 12:09 PM
http://www.onlinejournal.com/Commentary/011004Hasty/011004hasty.html Posted by: wv on August 1, 2004 12:11 PMWV, WV, http://ttagaris.dailykos.com/story/2004/7/31/134852/455 Namaste Posted by: Jo on August 1, 2004 02:02 PM
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/print/0,3858,4983473-102276,00.html Posted by: wv on August 1, 2004 02:05 PM Thanks Jo, hadn't got to KOS yet, still reading Told you guys awhile back that Laura the Fake librarian invited Children's authors to the WH and my editor and many others in the field including me NEVER HEARD OF THEM. Is it me or is Broken Record sounding a tad bit abusive? Posted by: Jonathan on August 1, 2004 03:50 PMAgainst my better judgement, let me say that there are those here who have welcomed you and your different point of view (myself being one of them), Joe, and who have asked for your astrological expertise to back up your claims that Bush will win. You've responded with personal attacks and, as it now stands, absolutely no info to move the astrological debate. This is, after all, an astrological site and, yes, we do support the Democratic Ticket. So, the only reason you're taking part is to stir the pot. If you have astrological info that supports your claims of a Bush win, please share it so we can all contrast and compare. Is it too much to ask? And if you don't believe astrology is worth anything, then why are you here? Jonathan Posted by: Jonathan on August 1, 2004 04:00 PMHere's the Repugs spin everyone, right out there for all to read and digest. Cast your eyes to read the Repug Shell Game of Deflection: it is to NEVER answer questions, to start blaming and bad mouthing the Questioner. Sally, it's time to delete the thick skulled cretin. "To call yourselves spiritually enlightened is like calling Saddam Hussein a born again Christian, you say all sorts of things to conceal the truth, but when it comes to November the "trial" for your candidate no amount of wishful thinkining, fake gestures, and astrology is going to save your candidate or Saddam Hussein." Should this poster be tolerated? Posted by: on August 1, 2004 04:06 PMThe fact that we wish to rid ourselves of a psychic vampire, energy eater is highly spiritually evovled. Get rid of him Sally. Posted by: sickofjoe on August 1, 2004 04:13 PM"Using stars for wish fulfillment are we?" "Sorry, but Kerry is going to need a lot more than a bunch of hollywood hippies talking about their private areas and slinging mud to win this election" These are just TWO examples (reading the rest of your ongoing diatribe started to make me feel ill) from earlier posts of yours that clearly bait and show little respect for those who post here. These two examples are how you started your Postings here, Joe, so if the response has been less than you hoped, perhaps you should Rewind and start again. Different points of view are welcome, but not if the Poster requesting them is mean-spirited, disrespectful and here only to argue. As for these exact coordinates, why don't you just friggin' Google (as many have urged you to do) and get the Candidate's charts yourself? I suspect, though, that that isn't the reason you're here. I do feel a bit sorry for you, Joe. To spend one's days being argumentative must not be a great deal of fun. Or at least the kind of thing I would think is fun. That having been said, I'm no longer responding to this. The use of astrology in politics is, after all, what this site is about. Namaste, Jonathan Posted by: on August 1, 2004 04:19 PMOnce again... "To call yourselves spiritually enlightened is like calling Saddam Hussein a born again Christian, you say all sorts of things to conceal the truth, but when it comes to November the "trial" for your candidate no amount of wishful thinkining, fake gestures, and astrology is going to save your candidate or Saddam Hussein."
Once again...
Should this poster be tolerated? Posted by: on August 1, 2004 04:26 PMJoe, Are you lonely? Why do you call negative attention to yourself? Posted by: bhakti on August 1, 2004 04:28 PM In our name and funded by our tax dollars: Something to ponder: Greatness cannot be found in the man who points at the misdeeds of others but in the man who finds in himself misdeeds and corrects them. Just a thought ... :-) Jonathan Posted by: Jonathan on August 1, 2004 04:29 PMThere are no misdeeds here, just a neocon throwing mudballs. Posted by: on August 1, 2004 04:31 PMJoe reflects his man Bush and just why we want him OUT. Go back and read the wasteful energy brought to his board. Something I've recently become aware of are the number of disenchanted Republicans who are staying in the Party, but voting for Kerry. John Kerry's website (www.johnkerry.com) has a multi-page thread of Republicans who voted for Bush in 2000, but can't imagine voting for him this time around. Is it because they don't like Bush? No, not really. Although many question his intelligence and sense of curiosity about the World he lives in, and many do feel lied to, it's more because of the NeoCon movement that's taken over the Republican Party. So, there are many, many disenchanted Republicans out there who are feeling ignored by their own Party who will be voting for Kerry this year. Also remember to that there are many military families and members of the military who, because of the ongoing "you're going home next month, nope, sorry, you have to stay 6 months more" backdoor draft, will be voting for Kerry this time around as well. And, in addition to that, the number of Americans currently living and working overseas who are registering to vote or taking part in the Election in some way (in support of Kerry) is up more dramatically this Election Cycle than in recent years. Just to remind everyone ... Jonathan Posted by: Jonathan on August 1, 2004 04:38 PMP.S. The Bush/Cheney website doesn't have a Forum for their Visitors or Members to post their thoughts. I checked there to see if the trend was bleeding over for the Republicans as well (Dems voting Republican), but, without a Forum for "disaffected Dems", it's hard to tell. Posted by: Jonathan on August 1, 2004 04:41 PMAnd if you begin posting the same rhetoric and the same nasty, mean-spirited, snide remarks you've posted here, you'll be booted off there in no time. The disaffected Republicans who post there are intelligent, respectful and support Kerry. Posted by: Jonathan on August 1, 2004 04:47 PMthe latest Zogby polls show a dramatic decrease in support for Bush. I think someone may have the numbers posted above. And my friends in Florida (any Floridians here?) say that Bush's decisions involving Cuba have angered many of those Republican leaning Cubans who are now threatening to stay home on Election Day. Add to that the rising number of Democrat leaning Hispanics and Latinos moving into Southern and Central Florida and it looks like Florida (despite Jeb's best efforts at gerrymandering the vote) will be solidly in the Kerry-Edwards column. Also, Arizona is looking good for Kerry. And with a Democratic Governor there (Janet Napolitano), the get out to vote efforts on Election Day will be MASSIVE. I think the same is true with N. Mexico (and Bill Richardson) and, despite Arnie being Gov in CA, Kerry is solid as a rock there. :-) Jonathan Posted by: Jonathan on August 1, 2004 04:55 PM" Wow, you are more EVIL than I thought. " Should this poster be tolerated? Posted by: on August 1, 2004 04:56 PMJoshua Micah Marshall over at Talking Points Memo, has provided some info relevant to the "tectonic shift" he mentioned a couple of months ago. Very interesting stuff. Extremely upsetting that "our" policies are based on such fraudulent info and that so little is being done to certify that info being passed is bona fide before it is ever used. For 30 pieces of silver to a bottom-feeder, we have the deaths of over 900 of our soldiers and who knows how many tens of thousands of innocent Iraqis. To say nothing of the wounded and maimed. Sigh, O sigh O Posted by: shylurker on August 1, 2004 04:57 PMBREAKING: Bush Campaign Accused of Racial Profiling Just picked these up from buzzflash: Wild about Kerry 8/1 Newsweek Poll: Kerry/Edwards Leads Bush/Cheney 52 to 44 Percent 8/1 Wooo-hooo! BTW, Mike, how was the movie? Posted by: shylurker on August 1, 2004 05:00 PMAlso, according to the Zogby figures from July 26 (I couldn't find the more recent ones ... maybe they come out early in the week?), in the Electoral College Kerry has a sizeable lead over Bush, 322-205. And in the States, the Battleground States, where Bush leads Kerry (there are only 4 where Bush leads Kerry: Arkansas by 2.8, Florida by 0.1, Ohio by 1.3 and W. Virgina by 3.9), it's all within the margin of error with each of them having a healthy number of Undecideds. Jonathan Posted by: Jonathan on August 1, 2004 05:02 PMThe New York Post is a shill for Repugs... who reads the rag? No one here... Posted by: Jo on August 1, 2004 05:09 PMNewsweek Aug. 9 issue - Secretary of State Colin Powell recently testified before a federal grand jury investigating the leak of the identity of CIA covert officer Valerie Plame, NEWSWEEK has learned. Powell's appearance on July 16 is the latest sign the probe being conducted by prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald is highly active and broader than has been publicly known. Sources close to the case say prosecutors were interested in discussions Powell had while with President George W. Bush on a trip to Africa in July 2003, just before Plame's identity was leaked to columnist Robert Novak. Closing the net? http://msnbc.msn.com/id/5570006/site/newsweek/
AOL News says that Bush will spend what amounts to a million dollars a day in August on attack ads on Kerry's record. After having already blown 100 million on same before. Posted by: Pat C on August 1, 2004 05:10 PMFla. GOP Advises Some to Vote Absentee Republican Gov. Jeb Bush has tried for months to persuade Florida voters touchscreen voting machines are reliable. His own party apparently hasn't gotten the message. The state GOP paid for a flier critical of the new technology and sent it to some south Florida voters where a primary election is scheduled next month. "The new electronic voting machines do not have a paper ballot to verify your vote in case of a recount," the message states. "Make sure your vote counts. Order your absentee ballot today." Posted by: Pat C on August 1, 2004 05:13 PMHas anyone seen this quote? "I do know I'm ready for the job. And, if not, that's just the way it goes." George W. Bush- Aug. 21, 2000 Posted by: Jonathan on August 1, 2004 05:18 PMWell, it's in line with the others I have seen. One of my favorites is, "Who cares what you think?" Posted by: Pat C on August 1, 2004 05:19 PMJo, Alot of people read the Post here in NYC. I see it all over on the subway, etc. Joe, So we will not answer your questions until you, the new guest, answer ours first. What about the 10,000+ dead in Iraq, 990+ dead American Soldiers, their families. Do you think they are loving GW? What about the questions I asked you above? No answers til you answer us first. Show some respect then we will respond with respect back. Posted by: bhakti on August 1, 2004 05:25 PMFrom TO, which directly links to the Wall Street Journal. The end of the Sandy Berger slime-out by the Repugs: http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/080104A.shtml Bottom-feeders all. Posted by: shylurker on August 1, 2004 05:28 PMWV, I appreciate your response. I see that in many ways you are seeking to balance the picture for the oppressed Palestinian people and I, too, would like them to be extended the rights that they so sorely deserve, rights that all human beings and creatures deserve as their birthright. I am in full support of this. What I am not in support of (and my husband doesn't necessarily agree with me) is justifying the terrorist actions of Hamas and the other organizations as a justifiable resistance movement, as the Yellow Times editorial seems to. As an outsider, I can see that Israel has committed grevious actions against the Palestinian peoples. However, I also see that Israel has been forced into a corner by terrorist actions. Each time Peace talks have been instituted, terrorist acts have escalated, so Israel has accordingly escalated. Is this right or wrong? I don't know. I would prefer that Israel did not, but, if they did nothing, I truly believe the Jihadists would not stop but would consider them weak (just as bin Ladin felt about the U.S.). I would like to respond to a few points that you have made: Lastly, what was it about the Barak's offer to Palestine in 1999 that was unacceptable? Clinton feels that Arafat has seen regretted turning it down. Sincerely, Wow wv, you reference such great articles. Are you an old scholar perhaps (in MT language)? Thank you for the Hastings article. I was googling "Franklin Cover up" yesterday. Now that is really dark. Makes one have to wonder about the elder G Bush. So weird, and this was around the time William Colby died. On a brighter note, I saw the Bill Maher RealTime show last friday where they begged Nadar not to run. But whatof that show was M Moore talking about "likely" voters. That the current polls the media is using reflect "likely" voters, not actual voters, which I am hoping will bring Kerry into office in a landslide. Then bopping over to read the recommended Koz article, it does give a good picture of what is going on out in the field. Beverly way up above somewhere said Kerry/Edwards were leaving from Muskegon to go to WI? I mean, I am tempted to make the sojourn just to see these guys, to experience the "energy" first hand. Posted by: Shade on August 1, 2004 05:45 PMThank you Sally. Thank you. Posted by: Pat C on August 1, 2004 05:52 PMI had a wonderful hardback ephemeris that expired end of 1999, it rendered the stations easy to read (for this student anyway). The one I have now leaves me in the dark. Question: when does tMercury begin its station Rx (it goes Rx 8/10) and when does the station end? Also, tPluto goes D on 8/30, or 8/29 (degree of expiation)? Am I correct in assuming Pluto S begins Aug 26th and ends Sep 4th? Mid GOP Convention? I am intrigued with outer planet stations... they're worth watching imho... tPluto has been D, Rx, and now moving D again on Dubya's nSouth Node. Making a point? Posted by: Jo on August 1, 2004 05:54 PMFascinating "Timeline of Corruption of America" over on the Plame thread at DU. Check out entry # 29. Wow. Posted by: shylurker on August 1, 2004 05:55 PMThanks Sally. Hope we all got educated on the Neo-Con-Artist Shell Game of Distraction after that and will 'know' it and recognize it when it comes up in our society. And how to deal with it. The demons will leave when you won't deflect. I am understanding how Arjuna battled his demons. Intellect with Heart is a big, and scary sword to Ignorance.
I am thinking we are in the 'shadow' of merc rx allready. I can feel it, right down to my fingers and type'o's. I meant to say in my previous post that "what stood out from that show for me was Michael Moore speaking about 'likely voters.'" Got to use that preview button more often. Posted by: Shade on August 1, 2004 06:11 PMCleansed! Sally, thank you ever so much! Posted by: shylurker on August 1, 2004 06:35 PMExcellent editorial page cartoon in today's Sacramento Bee: http://www.sacbee.com/content/opinion/cartoons/babin/story/10214155p-11134663c.html Posted by: shylurker on August 1, 2004 06:43 PMwe welcome insightful comments and discussion. to my knowledge there have only been two statements about bush from you , aside from the rhetoric, and they were: we haven't had any more attacks and bush hasn't "pushed the button" , like dems like to believe. Shylurker! Thanks for making my day! Posted by: Jo on August 1, 2004 06:56 PMblessings upon you joe. Mark Posted by: mark on August 1, 2004 06:59 PMJo -
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/printer_080204Y.shtml Posted by: wv on August 1, 2004 07:33 PMSally, Jo and All, thanks for the responses, these time zones always ruin the flow of conversation. My grandmother, who I barely knew, passed away last week, so it feels a bit strange (long story). The best news for world politics has been the democratic convention, a shift in energy. Bad news, from todays papers, is that up to 50% of women in Kwa-Zulu Natal, where I live, are HIV positive, thats one in two. It is very scary, the infection rate is increasing, that means we are not beating this virus. Whatever happens it is a virus inflicted on the body and not the soul. We just have to change our mindsets, rethink what it means to be living with or without the virus, until a cure is found. And not be afraid, I have been struggling with fear of infection, I can only be responsible for my sexual behaviour and not my partner, irrespective of the love and trust in our relationship. Thanks for this wonderful site that has attracted beautiful and smart souls. Posted by: Azara on August 1, 2004 07:37 PMMark, Neocons are not nice people. They play dirty. In my life I've learned how to level the playing ground with not nice people. They no nothing else, respect nothing else. Bringing up the 'good' person card ain't flying with me anymore when it comes to rotten behavior thrown my way. I will not turn my cheek (on myself) to be abused. Mirroring back the Neo tactics throws the ball of negative energy right back in their court where it belongs. I am not on Earth to show Joe the Way. But I have learned lessons on earth to see through the BS and then take it to the next level which is to purge the BS. This is the attitude of awareness, it is the attitude of Self-fullness and self containment, this attitude is not Selfish. i'm sick of talking about Joe. Azara, My condolances on the loss of your grandmother --- her passing as well as your not having knowledge of who she was... We Americans are soooo self-absorbed... riding down the highway I see countless bumperstickers "God Bless America"... indeed! Hasn't God (he/she/it) already blessed Americans to excess!? When will be begin to ask for blessings on others? I did see ONE sticker that read "God bless All Nations" --- My heart goes out to you and your people... may blessings and light surround you all... Namaste Posted by: Jo on August 1, 2004 07:53 PMDear Azara, I am so sorry to hear about your grandmother, there are never any words that can truly comfort when there is a loss of a loved one. I am heart sick to hear of the rise of HIV and can only imagine the fear of infection with which women are living. You are so right that the disease of of the body and not the soul and a personal committment to live without fear is the absolutely best thing you can do. Something must be done by this country, all the western countries to help Africa, it is essential to the world's well being, to the very soul of the world of all of us. I imagine you in your town, your home, listening and talking to people and focus my mine on a bubble of white light, health, and safety. I do believe that positive thoughts sent to others helps strengthen. I do know that science has proven that we are all connected by atoms and we can and do communicate through that connection. Take care Azara and what is that line from the movie Star Wars "the force is with you." Posted by: Sally on August 1, 2004 08:01 PMbhakti, Twice today I have had an "in your face" message from the universe: first, In Part IV of his "Day of The Dead" election series, Alex Miller-Mignone looks at e-voting and its star-crossed prospects this fall... http://www.daykeeperjournal.com/alex.shtml Secondly, a diary at Kos "Everyone Should Take Action on Computerized Voting Machines" http://www.dailykos.com/story/2004/8/1/73028/00509 I did a good bit of 'poll watching' in my younger days... and was considering organizing groups for the state this November when I was struck today that there's not a darn thing a poll watcher can do, for the manner of fraud perpetrated by these machines is not visible to the eye of the watcher! No need to worry about extra 'coaxing' by poll managers of elderly voters or others who ask for help... that's chicken feed compared to the potential numbers stolen by today's technology. So, don't shoot the messenger, but I'm beginning to wonder if what Sally and some others are seeing (or not 'seeing') for Nov 2nd is blatant, flagrant fraud, the kind the Neocons do so skillfully... Namaste
Azara, blessings and grace be upon you and all. I send you my love and visualize you and all healed and at peace. So be it. Posted by: Pat C on August 1, 2004 08:26 PMAnd if flagrant, blatant fraud is what gets Bush back in Office, I can almost guarantee his Impeachment and Removal from Office within 6 months after the Inauguration. There's only so much Republicans can explain away or excuse. Posted by: Jonathan on August 1, 2004 08:40 PMJonathan, Namaste Posted by: Jo on August 1, 2004 08:59 PMJo, Looks like you've found it! Now if only you could learn to harness TSaturn on your Stellium and work WITH it, you'd be in great shape! :-) Posted by: Jonathan on August 1, 2004 09:15 PMJonathan, I try... been a compressed summer, full of family/dharma/karma, and it's winding down (or at least tSaturn is moving off)... just in time for stuff on the macro level, right?! Namaste Posted by: Jo on August 1, 2004 09:45 PMJo, I am SUCH a Newbie! It feels almost like a sham even posting on this board! I just learned that a Square can be a "good thing" and a Trine can be a "bad thing". Who knew? I have TONS and TONS and TONS to learn. My goal is to learn how to let the astrological energies present (whether we're aware of them or not) HELP me, not run my life. I know, big goals ... but I'm a 0 degree Aries Sun with a Leo Rising and a Taurus Moon right next to (but not conjunct) a Taurus Midheaven! I always dream big. LOL WV, Sorry if I have offended you in any way. I took note of the fact that you have a Cancer asc, a Pisces moon and a Capricorn sun. Well, I have a Pisces sun (0) and a Cancer Ascendent (10), so we are probably very much alike -- we are just looking at two sides of the same coin. (As a matter of fact I have my moon conj pluto in Leo opp Mercury in Aquarius...I have always been a fighter for truth and fairness). As Joe said, I think both sides are wrong... and both sides are right. They each want the same thing - the ability to have a self-realized life filled with love, health, happiness and respect. I guess the best thing we can do is pray for peace, for love and for understanding, and hope that the hardliners on both sides soften to the point that they can have agreement. After all, the great Spirit that many call G-d, some call "the Universe," is the only judge and we learn through our mistakes, painful as they may be. Peace be with you, * Detained, abused, beaten, tortured, raped: Iraq's child prisoners A Sunday Herald investigation has discovered that coalition forces are holding more than 100 children in jails such as Abu Ghraib. Witnesses claim that the detainees - some as young as 10 - are also being subjected to rape and torture Reprinted from The Sunday Herald (Glasgow): http://www.sundayherald.com/43796 Who would Jesus rape!! Who would Jesus torture!! Is that what Jesus meant by "Suffer the little children?!" IS IT?!?!?!! This is the one behavior of a series of disasterous behaviors that tips my boat beyond all recall. The only behavior left by US/UK govts' sick, sick indulgences is cannibalism & they may be doing that as well. Posted by: JoannaOregon on August 2, 2004 02:38 PMDoes anyone have Kerry's birth time? I have his birthday and location. I have Bush's Data: 07/06/46, 7:46AM, New Haven, CT. The accuracy rating is "A" but don't know where this comes from exactly. Posted by: david on September 1, 2004 04:56 PMWould be very grateful for a chart of Barak who, intuition tells me, will one day be president. Apreciatively, Lynne Murguia Posted by: Lynne on October 14, 2004 11:11 PMThanks for that insightful comment! It makes interesting reading, especially when I need a cash advance. Posted by: cash advance on November 28, 2004 12:50 AMThanks for that insightful comment! It makes interesting reading, especially when I need a payday loan . Posted by: payday loan on November 28, 2004 05:46 AMWhat a bunch of shit! Well its well past the election and you touchy, feely, artistic, historically challenged retards where wrong again. You see the moon was in orbit around a star, planet combination. It wasn't in a house, dumb ass. Astrology had a place back when our average I Q was 20, (using today’s 100 value) because they had nothing else to go by, and where to stupid to think anything legitimate up. And you’re still using it. Do you also ride a donkey? Do you spend 20 hours a week doing laundry? Did you vote for Kerry? Then your a humanity hating, Pol Pot loving, America loathing, commie retard. Move On to North Korea and eat rats while fat man Kim dumb shit tells you it’s the people’s revolution. Don’t sit there; go now live your commie dream. And leave my http://www.download-stroke-job-adele-stephens.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-aimee-sweet.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-alexa-rae.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-alexus-winston.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-amanda-lex.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-amy-easton.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-anetta-keys.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-angelina-croft.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-anita-dark.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-april-summers.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-aria-giovanni.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-ashley-blue.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-asia.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-asshole.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-austria.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-avy-scott.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-barbados.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-belgium.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-bermuda.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-bobbi-barrington.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-boo.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-brandy-didder.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-briana-banks.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-brittney-skye.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-burundi.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-cambodia.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-carmen-luvana.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-catalina-cruz.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-chanel-stevens.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-cheyenne-silver.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-chloe-jones.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-claudia-adkins.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-comoros.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-croatia.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-cytherea.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-danni-ashe.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-denmark.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-dominica.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-dru-barrymore.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-el-salvador.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-equatorial-guinea.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-europa-island.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-felix-vicious.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-france.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-gambia.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-german.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-gina-ryder.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-grenada.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-guinea.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-hairs.hersofthand.com Posted by: ez on July 15, 2005 02:40 PMhttp://www.download-stroke-job-harley-rain.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-hong-kong.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-iceland.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-iran.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-italy.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-jan-mayen.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-jasmine-lynn.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-jenna-davis.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-jersey.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-jessie-capelli.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-jill-kelly.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-jordan.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-judy-suns.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-kari-gold.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-kayla-capri.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-kelle-marie.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-kelsey-heart.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-kiki-daire.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-kitana-jade.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-krystal-steal.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-lacey-duvalle.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-lauren-phoenix.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-lebanon.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-liberia.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-lindy-fox.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-lola-martin.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-luna-lane.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-madagascar.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-malta.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-mason-marconi.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-melissa-doll.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-mexican.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-mika-tan.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-monaco.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-monica-miller.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-mora-mia.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-nadia-styles.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-nauru.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-netherlands.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-nicaragua.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-nikita-blonde.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-nikki-tyler.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-norway.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-pakistan.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-paraguay.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-peru.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-picture.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-pornstar.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-puerto-rico.hersofthand.com | http://www.download-stroke-job-pussyshots.hersofthand.com Posted by: ez on July 15, 2005 02:41 PMhttp://www.oralcumqueens.biz/dirtylatinamaid/ http://www.allaboutashley.biz/ I agree with you .
http://hunter-milf.net http://hunter-milf.net/milf-hunter.php3 milf hunter http://huntermilf.net/xa.php milfhunter ryan http://1000-orgasms.tit4aday.com http://blogs.cjb.net/DonJohn/ I agree with you Post a comment
|